Daniel Lee Wai Yong

Daniel Lee Wai Yong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in corporate law and inducement of breach of contract. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and interest.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Interest	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Share Capital	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Share buybacks	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel in defiance of statute	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bars to rescission	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Right of first refusal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Real Estate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Daniel Lee Wai Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Daniel Lee Wai Yong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Haribo Asia Pacific v Aquarius Corp: Correction of Contractual Interest Rate in Damages Claim(Dec 2021) Haribo Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v Aquarius Corp: Breach of Contract, Damages, and Set-off Dispute(Dec 2021) IHC v Enterprise Fund: Share Buybacks & Companies Act s76/76A(Nov 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Daniel Lee Wai Yong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.8 parties avg	3.8	50%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	23.6 parties avg	3.6
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Daniel Lee Wai Yong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Partial	2(40%)	40%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
EUR	4,202,198.88	2,101,099.442 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2021	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Haribo Asia Pacific v Aquarius Corp: Correction of Contractual Interest Rate in Damages Claim 26 Dec 2021 Haribo Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	26 Dec 2021	Haribo Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Claim allowed in fullPlaintiff's claim for the principal sum of €1,526,224.76 and contractual interest of 7.12% was allowed in full. The total amount awarded as of December 2, 2021, was €2,050,063.01.
2	Haribo Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v Aquarius Corp: Breach of Contract, Damages, and Set-off Dispute 01 Dec 2021 Haribo Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial	01 Dec 2021	Haribo Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Claim allowed in partClaim allowed for principal sum and contractual interest until date of Defence and Counterclaim, with judgment interest thereafter.
3	IHC v Enterprise Fund: Share Buybacks & Companies Act s76/76A 12 Nov 2018 Value Monetization III Ltd (Defendant)Lost	12 Nov 2018	Value Monetization III Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantThe court ruled against the defendant, Value Monetization III Ltd.
4	Bumi Armada v Tozzi: Right of First Refusal & Inducement of Breach of Contract Dispute 05 Aug 2018 Bumi Armada Berhad (Appellant, Defendant)Won	05 Aug 2018	Bumi Armada Berhad (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in fullThe court found that BAB is not liable on the tort of inducing BAOHL’s breach of contract.