Daniel Liang

Daniel Liang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and restructuring and dissolution. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Daniel Liang has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Pathological arbitration clause	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction Clause	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Hybrid arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Liang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Daniel Liang has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	Goh Thien Phong v UT Singapore Services: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Classification(Oct 2024) Credit Suisse AG v Owner of Vessel “CHLOE V”: Security for Costs in Admiralty Claim(Sep 2022)
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	HKL Group Co Ltd v Rizq International Holdings: Stay of Proceedings and Security for Costs in Pathological Arbitration Clause Dispute(Mar 2013) HKL Group Co Ltd v Rizq International Holdings Pte Ltd: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration Clause Interpretation(Feb 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Daniel Liang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Neutral	28.0 parties avg	8.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	114.0 parties avg	14.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Daniel Liang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(25%)	25%
Neutral	2(50%)	50%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	265,000.00	132,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Goh Thien Phong v UT Singapore Services: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Classification 14 Oct 2024 Societe Generale, Singapore Branch (Non-party)Neutral	14 Oct 2024	Societe Generale, Singapore Branch (Non-party): NeutralThe judgment does not specify an outcome for this party.
2	Credit Suisse AG v Owner of Vessel “CHLOE V”: Security for Costs in Admiralty Claim 27 Sep 2022 Credit Suisse AG (Claimant, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	27 Sep 2022	Credit Suisse AG (Claimant, Defendant in Counterclaim): Application allowedApplication for security for costs allowed; defendant to provide security in the amount of $265,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	HKL Group Co Ltd v Rizq International Holdings: Stay of Proceedings and Security for Costs in Pathological Arbitration Clause Dispute 21 Mar 2013 HKL Group Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Neutral	21 Mar 2013	HKL Group Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Proceedings StayedProceedings stayed in favour of arbitration; no order as to costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	HKL Group Co Ltd v Rizq International Holdings Pte Ltd: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration Clause Interpretation 18 Feb 2013 HKL Group Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed	18 Feb 2013	HKL Group Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Application for default judgment dismissedHKL's application for default judgment was dismissed as the proceedings were stayed in favour of arbitration.