Daniel Lim

Daniel Lim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and patent infringement. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Daniel Lim has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in patents and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Patents	5 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Groundless threat of infringement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Revocation of patent	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Patent Validity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Novelty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inventive step	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Prior Art	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Daniel Lim has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok	2 cases	40% of cases	Dextra Asia v Mariwu: Patent Infringement & Novelty of Bartec Concrete Reinforcement Process(Apr 2007) Mariwu v Dextra: Admissibility of Fresh Evidence and 'Without Prejudice' Correspondence in Patent Infringement Case(Oct 2006)
Joyce A Tan & Partners	2 cases	40% of cases	Towa Corp v ASM Technology: Specific Discovery in Patent Infringement Suit(Feb 2015) Towa Corp v ASM Tech: Patent Infringement & Inspection of IDEALmold Machine(Aug 2014)
Shook Lin and Bok	1 cases	20% of cases	Dextra v Mariwu: Patent Infringement & Validity - Novelty & Inventiveness in Rebar Manufacturing(Jan 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Daniel Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Won	33.0 parties avg	3.0	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Daniel Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(20%)	20%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Towa Corp v ASM Technology: Specific Discovery in Patent Infringement Suit 01 Feb 2015 ASM Pacific Technology Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	01 Feb 2015	ASM Pacific Technology Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendant's application for specific discovery was dismissed in its entirety. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Towa Corp v ASM Tech: Patent Infringement & Inspection of IDEALmold Machine 07 Aug 2014 ASM Pacific Technology Ltd (Defendant)Won	07 Aug 2014	ASM Pacific Technology Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application for inspection of the IDEALmold machine was dismissed.
3	Dextra Asia v Mariwu: Patent Infringement & Novelty of Bartec Concrete Reinforcement Process 11 Apr 2007 Dextra Manufacturing Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	11 Apr 2007	Dextra Manufacturing Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff, Dextra Manufacturing Co Ltd.
4	Mariwu v Dextra: Admissibility of Fresh Evidence and 'Without Prejudice' Correspondence in Patent Infringement Case 09 Oct 2006 Dextra Manufacturing Co Ltd (Respondent)Neutral	09 Oct 2006	Dextra Manufacturing Co Ltd (Respondent): Remitted to Trial JudgeCase remitted to the trial judge to consider the new evidence.
5	Dextra v Mariwu: Patent Infringement & Validity - Novelty & Inventiveness in Rebar Manufacturing 26 Jan 2006 Dextra Manufacturing Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	26 Jan 2006	Dextra Manufacturing Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for the PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; an injunction is granted to restrain Mariwu from infringing the patent, and there will be an inquiry as to the damages suffered by Dextra as a result of the infringement. Dextra is entitled to the costs of the action. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.