Daniel Loh

Daniel Loh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in work injury compensation.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Daniel Loh has demonstrated expertise across 3 primary practice areas, with significant experience in employment law and insurance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Employment Law	1 cases	33% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Loh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 33% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	33% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Loh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 33% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	33% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Loh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 33% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Daniel Loh has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bernard & Rada Law Corporation	1 cases	100% of cases	MST Ruma Khatun v T & Zee Engineering: Work Injury Compensation & Insurer Liability(May 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Daniel Loh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Daniel Loh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,000.00	3,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	MST Ruma Khatun v T & Zee Engineering: Work Injury Compensation & Insurer Liability 22 May 2017 Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	22 May 2017	Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent): LostAppeal allowed; the decision of the AC that the policy issued by Liberty was not engaged because of the Tiler Objection was set aside. Liberty to pay costs of $3,000 plus reasonable disbursements to the appellant for this appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.