Daniel Seow Wei Jin

Daniel Seow Wei Jin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and insurance. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and negligence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Architects, Engineers and Surveyors	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mutual Legal Assistance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Tenancy in Common	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Indemnity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Liability insurance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duties and liabilities	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Writ of Seizure and Sale	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Seow Wei Jin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Daniel Seow Wei Jin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	SYT Consultants v QBE Insurance: Professional Indemnity & Breach of Duty Claims(Oct 2022) Kazzaz v. Standard Chartered Bank: Negligent Misrepresentation & Banking Advice(Jul 2020) Steep Rise Ltd v Attorney-General: Duty of Full Disclosure & Enforcement of Foreign Confiscation Order under MACMA(Mar 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Daniel Seow Wei Jin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	33.7 parties avg	3.7	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Daniel Seow Wei Jin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	120,000.00	40,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	SYT Consultants v QBE Insurance: Professional Indemnity & Breach of Duty Claims 06 Oct 2022 QBE Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	06 Oct 2022	QBE Insurance (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiff's claim.
2	Kazzaz v. Standard Chartered Bank: Negligent Misrepresentation & Banking Advice 12 Jul 2020 Standard Chartered Bank (Respondent, Defendant)Won	12 Jul 2020	Standard Chartered Bank (Respondent, Defendant): Judgment for RespondentAppeal dismissed; appellants ordered to pay SCB’s costs fixed at S$80,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Steep Rise Ltd v Attorney-General: Duty of Full Disclosure & Enforcement of Foreign Confiscation Order under MACMA 23 Mar 2020 Steep Rise Limited (Appellant)Lost	23 Mar 2020	Steep Rise Limited (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Steep Rise Limited ordered to pay costs of $40,000 to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Chan Yat Chun v Sng Jin Chye: Writ of Seizure and Sale for Tenant-in-Common Interest 15 Mar 2016 Chan Yat Chun (Plaintiff)Won	15 Mar 2016	Chan Yat Chun (Plaintiff): Application allowedPlaintiff's application for a writ of seizure and sale to be issued vis-à-vis the judgment debtor’s interest in a condominium was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.