Daniel Soo Ziyang

Daniel Soo Ziyang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in abuse of process and riddick principle. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Riddick principle	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Production of documents	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Soo Ziyang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Daniel Soo Ziyang has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Airtrust v Kao Chai-Chau: Illegality & Indemnity in Joint Tortfeasorship(Feb 2014) Global Distressed Alpha Fund I Ltd Partnership v Integrated Financial Advisory Ltd: Enforcement of UK Order(Jul 2012)
Selvam LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Lifting Riddick Undertaking for Hong Kong Proceedings(Apr 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Daniel Soo Ziyang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Daniel Soo Ziyang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	True Yoga v Wee Ewe Seng: Lifting Riddick Undertaking for Hong Kong Proceedings 24 Apr 2024 Patrick John Wee Ewe Seng (Defendant)Lost	24 Apr 2024	Patrick John Wee Ewe Seng (Defendant): Application grantedPlaintiffs' application allowed, for the sole purpose of allowing the Hong Kong Court to determine whether there had been a breach of its court order in HCA 1469/2019. Costs here and below are reserved to the trial judge. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Airtrust v Kao Chai-Chau: Illegality & Indemnity in Joint Tortfeasorship 13 Feb 2014 Kao Chai-Chau Linda (Defendant)Won	13 Feb 2014	Kao Chai-Chau Linda (Defendant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed for the commencement of third party proceedings.
3	Global Distressed Alpha Fund I Ltd Partnership v Integrated Financial Advisory Ltd: Enforcement of UK Order 24 Jul 2012 Global Distressed Alpha Fund I Ltd Partnership (Applicant)Lost	24 Jul 2012	Global Distressed Alpha Fund I Ltd Partnership (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication to register the UK Order was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.