Daniel Tan

Daniel Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 22 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 8 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and estate administration. Their track record shows a 45.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 17 complex cases, representing 77% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Daniel Tan has demonstrated expertise across 95 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	14 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	9 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	8 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transactions at an undervalue	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Residential Property Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common Intention Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intestacy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Comity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Arbitration Centre	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inheritance Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joinder of Parties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tracing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Group Restructuring	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction of Tribunal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Choice of Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction Challenge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Release	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agreements to stifle prosecution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreclosure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stakeholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moratorium	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair preferences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administration of Insolvent Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transfer	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Daniel Tan has been affiliated with 8 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	7 cases	32% of cases	JTrust Asia v Group Lease Holdings: Fraud, Misrepresentation & Conspiracy Claim(Feb 2020) IM Skaugen SE v MAN Energy: Moratorium under s 211B Companies Act & Schemes of Arrangement(Nov 2018) M+W Singapore v Leow Tet Sin: Dishonest Assistance, Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Trading(Jan 2015)
Wee Swee Teow & Co	4 cases	18% of cases	Hong Leong Singapore Finance Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Proprietary Estoppel & Land Titles Act(Nov 2006) Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Estate Inquiry Costs & Judgment(Jun 2003) Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Inquiry into Deceased's Estate Distribution(Jun 2003)
Wee Swee Teow and Co	3 cases	14% of cases	Lim Lie Hoa v Ong Jane Rebecca: Estate Distribution & Costs Dispute(May 2005) Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Inquiry into Estate Assets & Breach of Trust(Jan 2005) Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Appeal over Estate Valuation and Distribution(Jun 2004)
Ang & Partners	2 cases	9% of cases	Chee Yin Meh v Sim Guan Seng: Common Intention Constructive Trust, Proprietary Estoppel & Residential Property Act(Aug 2022) Sim Guan Seng v One Organisation: Insolvency, Undervalue Transactions & Unfair Preferences(Aug 2022)
Wong Partnership LLP	2 cases	9% of cases	Re Joseph David QC: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Complex International Arbitration Dispute(Dec 2011) AJT v AJU: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Illegality and Public Policy(Jul 2010)
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	2 cases	9% of cases	Founder Group v Singapore Commodities: Winding Up Stay & Payment Out Order Dispute(Oct 2024) Founder Group v Singapore JHC: Winding Up Application Dismissed Over Disputed Debt & Arbitration Agreement(May 2023)
Drew and Napier LLC	1 cases	5% of cases	Fustar Chemicals Ltd v Liquidator of Fustar Chemicals Pte Ltd: Proof of Debt in Members' Voluntary Winding Up(Jul 2009)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	5% of cases	Purcell v Singapore Flyer: Director's Removal and Inspection Rights under Companies Act(May 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Daniel Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.4
Complex Cases: 17 (77%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	84.4 parties avg	4.4	36%
Neutral	212.0 parties avg	12.0	9%
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	9%
Won	107.2 parties avg	7.2	45%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2004	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2005	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2006	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	24.3 parties avg	4.3
2011	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2012	111.0 parties avg	11.0
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	119.0 parties avg	19.0
2020	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2022	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Daniel Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(36%)	36%
Neutral	2(9%)	9%
Partial	2(9%)	9%
Won	10(45%)	45%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	12,171,954.05	1,217,195.4110 cases	10
USD	14,117,585.50	14,117,585.501 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 22 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Founder Group v Singapore Commodities: Winding Up Stay & Payment Out Order Dispute 28 Oct 2024 Founder Group (Hong Kong) Ltd (in liquidation) (Claimant)Won	28 Oct 2024	Founder Group (Hong Kong) Ltd (in liquidation) (Claimant): Payment Out Order GrantedPayment Out Order granted in the amount of US$14,117,585.50 (assumed USD, as the debt was claimed in USD).
2	Founder Group v Singapore JHC: Winding Up Application Dismissed Over Disputed Debt & Arbitration Agreement 28 May 2023 Founder Group (Hong Kong) Limited (in liquidation) (Claimant)Lost	28 May 2023	Founder Group (Hong Kong) Limited (in liquidation) (Claimant): Application DismissedWinding up application dismissed with costs.
3	Sim Guan Seng v One Organisation: Insolvency, Undervalue Transactions & Unfair Preferences 25 Aug 2022 Gateway Plus Limited (Defendant)Lost	25 Aug 2022	Gateway Plus Limited (Defendant): Order to pay to the Trustees the sum of $2.18mOrder to pay to the Trustees the sum of $2.18m
4	Chee Yin Meh v Sim Guan Seng: Common Intention Constructive Trust, Proprietary Estoppel & Residential Property Act 25 Aug 2022 Chee Yin Meh (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Aug 2022	Chee Yin Meh (Plaintiff): Action DismissedPlaintiff's action was dismissed.
5	JTrust Asia v Group Lease Holdings: Fraud, Misrepresentation & Conspiracy Claim 11 Feb 2020 Cougar Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	11 Feb 2020	Cougar Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; plaintiff's claims dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
6	IM Skaugen SE v MAN Energy: Moratorium under s 211B Companies Act & Schemes of Arrangement 26 Nov 2018 IM Skaugen Nordic Trustees Bondholders (Other)Neutral	26 Nov 2018	IM Skaugen Nordic Trustees Bondholders (Other): NeutralSupportive of the NewCo plan
7	M+W Singapore v Leow Tet Sin: Dishonest Assistance, Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Trading 15 Jan 2015 M+W Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	15 Jan 2015	M+W Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the defendants are jointly and severally liable for the sum of $5,348,413.51 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Lo Man Heng v UBS AG: Breach of Mandate & Unauthorised Payments 09 Jul 2014 UBS AG (Defendant)Won	09 Jul 2014	UBS AG (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiffs' claim.
9	PT First Media TBK v Astro Nusantara: Enforcement of Singapore Int'l Arbitration Award & Jurisdictional Challenge 30 Oct 2013 Astro Nusantara International BV (Respondent)Partial	30 Oct 2013	Astro Nusantara International BV (Respondent): Appeal Dismissed in PartAppeal dismissed in part, leave to enforce the Awards in both OS 807/2010 and OS 913/2010 is refused in relation to the Tribunal’s orders in the Awards that purport to apply as between PT First Media TBK and the 6th to 8th Respondents. Leave to enforce is granted only in relation to the Tribunal’s orders which are exclusively directed at the 1st to 5th Respondents.
10	Astro Nusantara v PT Ayunda: Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards & Jurisdictional Challenges 21 Oct 2012 All Asia Multimedia Networks FZ-LLC (Plaintiff)Won	21 Oct 2012	All Asia Multimedia Networks FZ-LLC (Plaintiff): Appeals DismissedPlaintiffs' appeals against the setting aside of judgments against FM were dismissed.
11	Re Joseph David QC: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Complex International Arbitration Dispute 11 Dec 2011 Joseph David QC (Applicant)Won	11 Dec 2011	Joseph David QC (Applicant): Application AllowedThe application for ad hoc admission was allowed.
12	EC Investment v Ridout Residence: Specific Performance & Property Sale Dispute 27 Sep 2011 Thomas Chan Ho Lam (Respondent)Neutral	27 Sep 2011	Thomas Chan Ho Lam (Respondent): NeutralCited as having been granted an option to purchase the property. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	AJT v AJU: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Illegality and Public Policy 15 Jul 2010 AJU (Defendant)Lost	15 Jul 2010	AJU (Defendant): Application to set aside the Award allowedApplication to set aside the Award allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Purcell v Singapore Flyer: Director's Removal and Inspection Rights under Companies Act 20 May 2010 Great Singapore Flyer Holding Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	20 May 2010	Great Singapore Flyer Holding Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application against the fourth defendant was dismissed with costs.
15	Fustar Chemicals Ltd v Liquidator of Fustar Chemicals Pte Ltd: Proof of Debt in Members' Voluntary Winding Up 29 Jul 2009 Fustar Chemicals Ltd (Hong Kong) (Appellant)Won	29 Jul 2009	Fustar Chemicals Ltd (Hong Kong) (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; OSH directed to accept FCL’s proof of debt, inclusive of interest at the rate of 3% per annum which is to be calculated on the basis it commences 3 months after the date the proof of debt was lodged with the Company. The appellant will be entitled to costs here and below, with the usual consequential orders. OSH’s costs and disbursements in relation and incidental to FCL’s proof of debt were not properly incurred and she is entitled to be paid her costs and disbursements from the assets of the Company only after all the Company’s creditors have been paid. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Hong Leong Singapore Finance Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Proprietary Estoppel & Land Titles Act 22 Nov 2006 Hong Leong Singapore Finance Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	22 Nov 2006	Hong Leong Singapore Finance Ltd (Plaintiff): PartialPartial success; entitled to relief based on Yongnam's claim.
17	Lim Lie Hoa v Ong Jane Rebecca: Estate Distribution & Costs Dispute 03 May 2005 Lim Lie Hoa (Appellant)Lost	03 May 2005	Lim Lie Hoa (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to be paid to Jane Ong. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Inquiry into Estate Assets & Breach of Trust 18 Jan 2005 Lim Lie Hoa (Respondent)Won	18 Jan 2005	Lim Lie Hoa (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the respondent was dismissed.
19	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Appeal over Estate Valuation and Distribution 15 Jun 2004 Lim Lie Hoa (Defendant)Won	15 Jun 2004	Lim Lie Hoa (Defendant): Appeal dismissedFirst defendant's appeal against the AR’s findings as to the amount distributed to the second defendant was dismissed.
20	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Estate Inquiry Costs & Judgment 29 Jun 2003 Lim Lie Hoa (also known as Lim Le Hoa and Lily Arief Husni) (First Defendant)Lost	29 Jun 2003	Lim Lie Hoa (also known as Lim Le Hoa and Lily Arief Husni) (First Defendant): Judgment against First DefendantFinal judgment for the Plaintiff against the First Defendant for S$2,321,770.27 with interest. Ordered to pay the costs of the inquiry to the Plaintiff, Second Defendant, and Third and Fourth Defendants, with certain exceptions.
21	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Inquiry into Deceased's Estate Distribution 12 Jun 2003 Lim Lie Hoa (also known as Lim Le Hoa and Lily Arief Husni) (Defendant)Lost	12 Jun 2003	Lim Lie Hoa (also known as Lim Le Hoa and Lily Arief Husni) (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against Defendant in the amount of $2,321,770.27 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Interim Payments, Mareva Injunctions & Third Party Proceedings in Estate Inquiry 26 Sep 2002 Lim Lie Hoa (Defendant, Third Party)Lost	26 Sep 2002	Lim Lie Hoa (Defendant, Third Party): Application to discharge Mareva injunction dismissedApplication to discharge a Mareva injunction imposed by the court was dismissed.