Daniel Tay Yi Ming

Daniel Tay Yi Ming is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and performance bond. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Postal Rule	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and bonds	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Related Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Daniel Tay Yi Ming has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Daniel Tay Yi Ming has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chan Neo LLP	3 cases	60% of cases	Wan Sern Metal Industries v Hua Tian Engineering: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice(Feb 2025) Wan Sern Metal Industries v Hua Tian Engineering: Setting Aside Arbitration Award(Jan 2024) Management Corporation v Coral Edge: Voiding Dissolution for Defect Claim(Oct 2022)
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	2 cases	40% of cases	1L30G Pte Ltd v EQ Insurance Company Ltd: Interpretation of Contractual Terms and the Postal Rule(Oct 2017) Tactic Engineering Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd: Performance Bond Dispute(May 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Daniel Tay Yi Ming's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Daniel Tay Yi Ming's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	206,000.00	51,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wan Sern Metal Industries v Hua Tian Engineering: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice 12 Feb 2025 Hua Tian Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	12 Feb 2025	Hua Tian Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent): Partial LossThe appeal was allowed in part, specifically regarding the Balance Work Counterclaim. The award was set aside insofar as it concerns the Balance Work Counterclaim.
2	Wan Sern Metal Industries v Hua Tian Engineering: Setting Aside Arbitration Award 31 Jan 2024 Hua Tian Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	31 Jan 2024	Hua Tian Engineering Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed. Costs of S$15,000 awarded to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Management Corporation v Coral Edge: Voiding Dissolution for Defect Claim 06 Oct 2022 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 4339 (Applicant)Lost	06 Oct 2022	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 4339 (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication to void the dissolution of the respondent was dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to pay costs to the Former Liquidators fixed at S$18,000 (including disbursements). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	1L30G Pte Ltd v EQ Insurance Company Ltd: Interpretation of Contractual Terms and the Postal Rule 01 Oct 2017 1L30G PTE LTD (Plaintiff)Won	01 Oct 2017	1L30G PTE LTD (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe defendant shall pay the plaintiff $158,000 pursuant to the plaintiff’s demand dated 19 January 2017 on the balance value of the Bond. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Tactic Engineering Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Sato Kogyo (S) Pte Ltd: Performance Bond Dispute 16 May 2017 Tactic Engineering Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Applicant)Lost	16 May 2017	Tactic Engineering Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the Injunction dismissed; costs of $15,000 (all-in) to be paid by Tactic to Sato Kogyo. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.