Darius Bragassam

Darius Bragassam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in performance bond and legal profession act. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Darius Bragassam has demonstrated expertise across 38 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and fraud and deceit.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trustee Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trustee Powers	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Repudiation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Privity of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collective Sale	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Consent	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Darius Bragassam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Darius Bragassam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	4 cases	100% of cases	Sunrise Industries v PT OKI Pulp: Performance Bond Dispute & Fraud Exception(Jun 2018) AAY v AAZ: Arbitration Confidentiality, Repudiation of Agreement, and Disclosure to Authorities(Jun 2009) Wong Lai Keen v Allgreen: Collective Sale Dispute over Regent Garden Condominium(Sep 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Darius Bragassam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	24.5 parties avg	4.5	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Darius Bragassam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sunrise Industries v PT OKI Pulp: Performance Bond Dispute & Fraud Exception 20 Jun 2018 PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills (Defendant)Won	20 Jun 2018	PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills (Defendant): Injunctions set asidePT OKI succeeded in setting aside the injunctions obtained by Sunrise.
2	AAY v AAZ: Arbitration Confidentiality, Repudiation of Agreement, and Disclosure to Authorities 14 Jun 2009 AAY and others (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Jun 2009	AAY and others (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claim that the defendant repudiated the arbitration agreement was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Wong Lai Keen v Allgreen: Collective Sale Dispute over Regent Garden Condominium 17 Sep 2008 Allgreen Properties Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	17 Sep 2008	Allgreen Properties Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Judgment for Allgreen Properties LimitedThe court found in favor of Allgreen Properties Limited, declaring the Sale and Purchase Agreement valid and subsisting. The court ordered the majority owners to complete the sale.
4	Law Society v Ahmad Khalis: Show Cause Action, Legal Professional Conduct, and Fiduciary Duty 20 Aug 2006 Ahmad Khalis bin Abdul Ghani (Respondent)Lost	20 Aug 2006	Ahmad Khalis bin Abdul Ghani (Respondent): Suspended from practiceThe respondent was suspended from practice for a period of two years.