Darius Lee

Darius Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in pleadings and setting aside default judgement. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Darius Lee has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Default Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Ostensible Authority	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bareboat Charter	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction of Barges	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Exclusive Jurisdiction Agreement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Redelivery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constructive Delivery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Darius Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Darius Lee has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Legal Solutions LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	PT Selecta Bestama v Sin Huat Huat: Setting Aside Default Judgment and Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Barge Construction Dispute(Jul 2015) Winplus Corp v Frumentarius: Admiralty Jurisdiction & Bareboat Charter Termination(Feb 2015)
Foxwood LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Soh Rui Yong v Singapore Athletic Association: Striking Out Plea of Malice in Defamation Suit(Oct 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Darius Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Darius Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	173,500.00	86,750.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Soh Rui Yong v Singapore Athletic Association: Striking Out Plea of Malice in Defamation Suit 11 Oct 2020 Soh Rui Yong (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	11 Oct 2020	Soh Rui Yong (Plaintiff, Respondent): Plea of malice struck outParagraph 25 of the Amended Reply and its accompanying particulars struck out under Order 18 rr 19(1)(b) and 19(1)(c) of the Rules of Court.
2	PT Selecta Bestama v Sin Huat Huat: Setting Aside Default Judgment and Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Barge Construction Dispute 29 Jul 2015 Sin Huat Huat Marine Transportation Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	29 Jul 2015	Sin Huat Huat Marine Transportation Pte Ltd (Defendant): Default judgment set aside on conditionDefault judgment set aside on condition that the Defendant pays $173,500 into court. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Winplus Corp v Frumentarius: Admiralty Jurisdiction & Bareboat Charter Termination 17 Feb 2015 Frumentarius Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	17 Feb 2015	Frumentarius Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed against the Assistant Registrar’s decision to set aside the in rem writ.