Darrell Low

Darrell Low is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and wills and probate. Their track record shows a 63.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Darrell Low has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trust law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trust Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trusts — Constructive trusts	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trusts — Express trusts	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Common Intention Constructive Trust	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidator	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance and champerty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
False Imprisonment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidator’s statutory power of sale	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prosecutorial Delay	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rehabilitation of Offenders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Detention	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Darrell Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Darrell Low has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Yusarn Audrey	3 cases	50% of cases	Solvadis v Affert: Litigation Funding, Liquidator's Powers & Public Policy(Sep 2018) UJT v UJR: Resulting & Constructive Trusts, Probate, & Right of Abode Dispute(Feb 2018) UJT v UJR: Resulting & Constructive Trusts, Probate, & Right of Abode Dispute(Feb 2018)
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	33% of cases	Amutha Valli v Redemptorist Fathers: Tort Claims for Assault, False Imprisonment & Negligence in Alleged Exorcism(Feb 2009) Chan Kum Hong Randy v Public Prosecutor: Mitigating Effect of Delay in Criminal Prosecution(Feb 2008)
Dennis Chua & Co	1 cases	17% of cases	Wong Sin Yee v Minister for Home Affairs: Judicial Review of Detention Order under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act(Sep 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Darrell Low's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 4 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Won	54.8 parties avg	4.8	83%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	11.0 parties avg	1.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2018	34.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Darrell Low's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(38%)	38%
Won	5(63%)	63%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	5 23	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Won: 3 cases (60.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Solvadis v Affert: Litigation Funding, Liquidator's Powers & Public Policy 27 Sep 2018 Affert Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	27 Sep 2018	Affert Resources Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application GrantedThe liquidators' application to approve the agreement was granted.
2	UJT v UJR: Resulting & Constructive Trusts, Probate, & Right of Abode Dispute 26 Feb 2018 UJR (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	26 Feb 2018	UJR (Defendant, Plaintiff): Orders GrantedOrders were made pursuant to the Probate Application to facilitate the sale of the property.
3	UJT v UJR: Resulting & Constructive Trusts, Probate, & Right of Abode Dispute 26 Feb 2018 UJR (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	26 Feb 2018	UJR (Defendant, Plaintiff): Orders GrantedOrders were made pursuant to the Probate Application to facilitate the sale of the property.
4	Amutha Valli v Redemptorist Fathers: Tort Claims for Assault, False Imprisonment & Negligence in Alleged Exorcism 12 Feb 2009 Jacob Ong Siong Teck (Defendant)Won	12 Feb 2009	Jacob Ong Siong Teck (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe plaintiff's claim against the third defendant was dismissed.
5	Chan Kum Hong Randy v Public Prosecutor: Mitigating Effect of Delay in Criminal Prosecution 03 Feb 2008 Chan Kum Hong Randy (Appellant)Won	03 Feb 2008	Chan Kum Hong Randy (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; sentences reduced to two days' imprisonment.
6	Wong Sin Yee v Minister for Home Affairs: Judicial Review of Detention Order under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act 18 Sep 2007 WONG SIN YEE (Applicant)Lost	18 Sep 2007	WONG SIN YEE (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for review of detention order was dismissed.