Darren Low Jun Jie

Darren Low Jun Jie is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and security for costs. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Attachment of Debts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Principles	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Darren Low Jun Jie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Darren Low Jun Jie has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
JWS Asia Law Corporation	3 cases	75% of cases	Art Ask Agency SL v Person(s) Unknown (“LXS-WL STORE”): Enforcement Order and Debt Attachment Dispute(Aug 2023) SW Trustees v. Tesemma: Security for Costs Application in Liquidation(May 2023) Rohrlach v Qantas: Contempt of Court for Breach of Restraint of Trade Injunction(Dec 2021)
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Bajaj v. Ueda: Setting Aside Statutory Demand for Unaccrued Debts(Nov 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Darren Low Jun Jie's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Partial	18.0 parties avg	8.0	25%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	25.5 parties avg	5.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Darren Low Jun Jie's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	25,000.00	25,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Art Ask Agency SL v Person(s) Unknown (“LXS-WL STORE”): Enforcement Order and Debt Attachment Dispute 27 Aug 2023 Alipay Merchant Services Pte Ltd (Other)Lost	27 Aug 2023	Alipay Merchant Services Pte Ltd (Other): Application dismissed in partAMS's application for orders to release specific parts of the debts which had been attached under EO 14 be released and any and all debts due to each of the enforcement respondents from AMS at some future date or at certain intervals in the future be released from attachment after payment has been made by AMS to the Sheriff and the enforcement applicant pursuant to EO 14 was dismissed.
2	SW Trustees v. Tesemma: Security for Costs Application in Liquidation 30 May 2023 Teodros Ashenafi Tesemma (Defendant, Third Party, Appellant)Partial	30 May 2023	Teodros Ashenafi Tesemma (Defendant, Third Party, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part to the extent that the first defendant is entitled to security for costs in respect of the costs of trial and post-trial work.
3	Rohrlach v Qantas: Contempt of Court for Breach of Restraint of Trade Injunction 02 Dec 2021 Rohrlach, Nicolas Robert Adam (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Dec 2021	Rohrlach, Nicolas Robert Adam (Plaintiff): Order of committal grantedPlaintiff to pay a fine of S$25,000 within two weeks, with a term of one week’s imprisonment in default of payment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Bajaj v. Ueda: Setting Aside Statutory Demand for Unaccrued Debts 17 Nov 2019 Yashwant Bajaj (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	17 Nov 2019	Yashwant Bajaj (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; statutory demand set aside.