David Lee

David Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and drug crimes.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

David Lee has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and drug crimes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	David Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	David Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Trafficking in controlled drugs	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	David Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Possession of Drugs	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Additional Evidence	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	David Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

David Lee has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ang & Lee	1 cases	100% of cases	Tay Kah Tiang v PP: Drug Trafficking, Possession, and Presumption under Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of David Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of David Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tay Kah Tiang v PP: Drug Trafficking, Possession, and Presumption under Misuse of Drugs Act 30 Mar 2001 Tay Kah Tiang (Appellant)Lost	30 Mar 2001	Tay Kah Tiang (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against her conviction for possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking was dismissed.