David Low

David Low is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and theft. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

David Low has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	David Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	David Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	David Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	David Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	David Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	David Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	David Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	David Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	David Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	David Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	David Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

David Low has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Deputy Public Prosecutors	2 cases	67% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Pang Siew Fum: Trafficking of Diamorphine(Feb 2010) Aam Usup v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Theft as Domestic Worker(Oct 2009)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	33% of cases	Public Prosecutor v AGG: Rape, Outrage of Modesty, and Road Traffic Offences(Mar 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of David Low's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of David Low's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v AGG: Rape, Outrage of Modesty, and Road Traffic Offences 18 Mar 2010 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	18 Mar 2010	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was convicted on all charges.
2	Public Prosecutor v Pang Siew Fum: Trafficking of Diamorphine 03 Feb 2010 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	03 Feb 2010	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionBoth accused persons were found guilty.
3	Aam Usup v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Theft as Domestic Worker 05 Oct 2009 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	05 Oct 2009	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence.