Davis Tan

Davis Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal profession act and assessment of legal costs. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Davis Tan has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in legal profession act and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	22% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Davis Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 22% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Davis Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Davis Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Davis Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Admission to the Bar	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Davis Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Davis Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Davis Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Davis Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Davis Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Re CTA: Applicants' Admission to the Bar Adjourned Due to Cheating on Bar Exam(Apr 2022) H&C S Holdings v Gabriel Law: Legal Profession, Remuneration & Bill of Costs(Jul 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Davis Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	19.0 parties avg	9.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	19.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Davis Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re CTA: Applicants' Admission to the Bar Adjourned Due to Cheating on Bar Exam 17 Apr 2022 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Neutral	17 Apr 2022	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): NeutralThe Law Society of Singapore agreed with the Attorney General's proposal to adjourn the applications.
2	H&C S Holdings v Gabriel Law: Legal Profession, Remuneration & Bill of Costs 25 Jul 2018 H&C S Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	25 Jul 2018	H&C S Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Partial WinLeave granted to have Invoice 39 and Invoice 86 taxed.