Dawn Ho

Dawn Ho is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and strata title law. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Dawn Ho has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in statutory interpretation and corporate governance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Ho has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Dawn Ho has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	60% of cases	Lian Hwee Choo Phebe v Maxz Universal: Minority Oppression & Share Dilution(Sep 2010) Lian Hwee Choo Phebe v Maxz Universal: Share Issuance, Articles of Association & Statutory Interpretation(Jan 2009) Lian Hwee Choo Phebe v Maxz Universal: Validity of Share Issuance Resolution under Companies Act(Jun 2008)
Drew & Napier	2 cases	40% of cases	Regenthill Properties v Management Corp: Delivery of Condo Maintenance Fund Records(Jul 2002) Management Corp v Regenthill: Developer's Duty to Hand Over Condo Records(Feb 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Dawn Ho's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	27.3 parties avg	7.3	40%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	26.0 parties avg	6.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2009	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2010	110.0 parties avg	10.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Dawn Ho's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lian Hwee Choo Phebe v Maxz Universal: Minority Oppression & Share Dilution 07 Sep 2010 Cairnhill Treasure Investment (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	07 Sep 2010	Cairnhill Treasure Investment (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Buy-out of plaintiffs’ shares orderedBuy-out of plaintiffs’ shares ordered at the higher of their value immediately prior to the First Rights Issue or the current value. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Lian Hwee Choo Phebe v Maxz Universal: Share Issuance, Articles of Association & Statutory Interpretation 12 Jan 2009 Tan Boon Kian (Respondent)Won	12 Jan 2009	Tan Boon Kian (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal against the individual was dismissed.
3	Lian Hwee Choo Phebe v Maxz Universal: Validity of Share Issuance Resolution under Companies Act 29 Jun 2008 Wong Choon Hoy (Defendant)Won	29 Jun 2008	Wong Choon Hoy (Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantThe court ruled that the resolution did not contravene the Articles of Association of MDG. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Regenthill Properties v Management Corp: Delivery of Condo Maintenance Fund Records 04 Jul 2002 Regenthill Properties Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	04 Jul 2002	Regenthill Properties Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal by Regenthill Properties Pte Ltd was dismissed. The court ordered Regenthill to pay 40% of the costs to the respondent. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore, where the judgment was issued.
5	Management Corp v Regenthill: Developer's Duty to Hand Over Condo Records 18 Feb 2002 Regenthill Properties Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	18 Feb 2002	Regenthill Properties Pte Ltd (Defendant): Order accordinglyOrder to disclose and hand over certain accounting documents. Request for final defects list denied.