Dawn Noeline Tan

Dawn Noeline Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and performance bond.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Dawn Noeline Tan has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and collections.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dawn Noeline Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dawn Noeline Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dawn Noeline Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dawn Noeline Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dawn Noeline Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dawn Noeline Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dawn Noeline Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dawn Noeline Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dawn Noeline Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Dawn Noeline Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Dawn Noeline Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dawn Noeline Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Licensing Agreements	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Dawn Noeline Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Dawn Noeline Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	OMG Holdings v Pos Ad: Royalty Payments, Misrepresentation & Restraint of Trade(Nov 2011) JBE Properties v Gammon: Interim Injunction Against Performance Bond Call Due to Unconscionability(Dec 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Dawn Noeline Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Dawn Noeline Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	OMG Holdings v Pos Ad: Royalty Payments, Misrepresentation & Restraint of Trade 16 Nov 2011 Pos Ad Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Partial	16 Nov 2011	Pos Ad Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Counterclaim dismissed in partDefendant's counterclaim dismissed except for the declaration sought that cl 9.3 of the 2004 Agreement is in restraint of trade. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	JBE Properties v Gammon: Interim Injunction Against Performance Bond Call Due to Unconscionability 02 Dec 2010 JBE Properties Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	02 Dec 2010	JBE Properties Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal against the grant of the Interim Injunction was dismissed, but the Ancillary Orders were set aside.