Deborah Barker

Deborah Barker is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 39 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fraud and deceit and wills and probate. Their track record shows a 41.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 26% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Deborah Barker has demonstrated expertise across 157 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	29 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 29 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	13 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 13 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	8 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	8 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	8 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intestacy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domicile	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Easements	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Probate Administration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Resealing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal representatives	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Transfer	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Express Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trusts — Constructive trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trusts — Express trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Procedural Breaches	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deed of Family Arrangement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Nominee Purchase Arrangement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable Set-Off	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tortious liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mental Disability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Law of Wills	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Renunciation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Certificate of Inheritance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loss of Inheritance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Market Manipulation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forward Freight Agreements (FFAs)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Derivatives Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Human Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory Applications	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rights of way	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Land disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abandonment of Easement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pre-emption Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Arrangement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Maritime Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Duty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-setoff clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Automobile Repair Business	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Memorandum of Understanding	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indoor management rule	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rule in Turquand's case	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
On-board Courier Services	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Will Execution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discharge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Deborah Barker has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Deborah Barker has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
KhattarWong	13 cases	33% of cases	Khoh Chen Yeh Shane v Seng Realty: Share Transfer Dispute under Companies Act(Apr 2012) Chia Foong Lin v Chan Yuen Yee: Easement Dispute over Kerb Wall, Gate, Parking & Use of Private Road(Dec 2011) Ching Chew Weng Paul v Ching Pui Sim: Setting Aside Judgment for Fraud in Trust Asset Recovery(Mar 2011)
KhattarWong LLP	12 cases	31% of cases	Lilyana Alwi v. John Arifin: Express Trusts, Resulting Trusts, Breach of Trust, and Fraud(May 2019) Naughty G Pte Ltd v Fortune Marketing Pte Ltd: Oral Contract Dispute over Distributorship Agreement(Sep 2018) Yuanta Asset Management v Telemedia Pacific: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty, and Conversion in Joint Venture(Jun 2018)
Withers KhattarWong LLP	5 cases	13% of cases	CIX v DGN: Res Judicata & Tort Claims Against Expert After Arbitration Loss(May 2024) Macs Associates v. Siew Kang Yoke: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order for Breach of Confidence(Sep 2021) CIX v CIY: Setting Aside Partial Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Exceeding Scope of Submission(Mar 2021)
Khattar Wong & Partners	5 cases	13% of cases	Alagappa Subramanian v Chidambaram: Family Account Dispute & Overdrawn Funds(May 2003) Colombo Dockyard v. Metro Maritime: Recovery of Funds & Illegality in Contract(Dec 2002) Chidambaram v Alagappa: Trust Fund Overdraw & Estate Distribution Dispute(Sep 2002)
Khattar Wong	2 cases	5% of cases	AQT v AQU: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Wife & Children Maintenance(May 2011) Yap v Tan: Stay of Proceedings & Anti-Suit Injunction in Partnership Dispute(Jan 2011)
Khattar Wong LLP	1 cases	3% of cases	Sinolanka Hotels v Interna Contract: Dispute over Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction(Jul 2018)
Khattar Wong & Pnrs	1 cases	3% of cases	Universal Express LLC v Jupiter Air Ltd: Breach of Contract & Non-Competition in Courier Services(Feb 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Deborah Barker's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 10 (26%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	152.8 parties avg	2.8	38%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Partial	72.6 parties avg	2.6	18%
Won	164.3 parties avg	4.3	41%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	52.4 parties avg	2.4
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	33.4 parties avg	3.4
2008	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2009	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	42.6 parties avg	2.6
2012	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2018	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	27.8 parties avg	7.8
2021	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Deborah Barker's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	15(38%)	38%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	7(18%)	18%
Won	16(41%)	41%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	14,341,420.81	597,559.2024 cases	24
USD	649,187.50	649,187.501 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	5 14	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2003	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	3 21	Partial: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2008	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2009	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2012	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 39 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CIX v DGN: Res Judicata & Tort Claims Against Expert After Arbitration Loss 23 May 2024 CIX (Plaintiff)Lost	23 May 2024	CIX (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay indemnity costs to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Macs Associates v. Siew Kang Yoke: Setting Aside Anton Piller Order for Breach of Confidence 12 Sep 2021 Lee Soon Weng (Defendant)Won	12 Sep 2021	Lee Soon Weng (Defendant): Application to set aside Anton Piller Order allowedThe court allowed the defendant's application to set aside the Anton Piller Order.
3	CIX v CIY: Setting Aside Partial Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Exceeding Scope of Submission 04 Mar 2021 CIX (Plaintiff)Lost	04 Mar 2021	CIX (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication to set aside certain findings in a partial arbitration award was dismissed. Legal costs of $24,000 plus disbursements of $4,696.60 awarded to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Anil Singh Gurm v J.S. Yeh & Co: Negligence Claim in Property Purchase 21 Jul 2020 Anil Singh Gurm (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Jul 2020	Anil Singh Gurm (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed in its entirety.
5	JTrust Asia v Group Lease Holdings: Fraud, Misrepresentation & Conspiracy Claim 11 Feb 2020 Baguera Limited (Defendant)Won	11 Feb 2020	Baguera Limited (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; plaintiff's claims dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
6	Lilyana Alwi v. John Arifin: Express Trusts, Resulting Trusts, Breach of Trust, and Fraud 01 May 2019 Lilyana Alwi (Plaintiff)Won	01 May 2019	Lilyana Alwi (Plaintiff): Beneficially entitled to the credit balance in the Joint AccountsThe plaintiff was declared beneficially entitled to the credit balance in the Joint Accounts. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Naughty G Pte Ltd v Fortune Marketing Pte Ltd: Oral Contract Dispute over Distributorship Agreement 02 Sep 2018 Naughty G Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	02 Sep 2018	Naughty G Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $125,561.23 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Sinolanka Hotels v Interna Contract: Dispute over Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction 05 Jul 2018 Interna Contract SpA (Defendant)Won	05 Jul 2018	Interna Contract SpA (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendant was awarded costs of S$15,000. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Yuanta Asset Management v Telemedia Pacific: Breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty, and Conversion in Joint Venture 19 Jun 2018 Yeh Mao-Yuan (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	19 Jun 2018	Yeh Mao-Yuan (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partMr Yeh must account to TPG for a principal sum of S$2,171,250, being the value of the October 225m shares at the time of his dishonest misappropriation. Including interest calculated according to the Judge’s formula, Mr Yeh is to pay TPG the sum of S$2,749,888.13. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Ong Han Ling v American International Assurance: Insurance Fraud, Vicarious Liability & Conspiracy 28 Dec 2017 ENNY ARIANDINI PRAMANA (Plaintiff)Won	28 Dec 2017	ENNY ARIANDINI PRAMANA (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the sum of S$1,597,250.69, with interest thereon at the rate of 5.33% per annum from 1 March 2013 to the date of payment.
11	Yeo Henry v Yeo Charles: Testamentary Capacity & Succession of Ng Lay Hua's Estate 10 Oct 2016 Yeo Henry @ Yeo Wee Heng (Plaintiff, Defendant-in-Counterclaim)Won	10 Oct 2016	Yeo Henry @ Yeo Wee Heng (Plaintiff, Defendant-in-Counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffCourt pronounces in favour of the 2012 Will and decree the Grant of Probate of the 2012 Will to the plaintiff.
12	TMT Asia v BHP Billiton: Market Manipulation, FFAs, and Securities & Futures Act 27 Jan 2015 TMT Asia Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	27 Jan 2015	TMT Asia Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, striking out order set aside except for the claim in the alleged tort of market manipulation.
13	Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A and Equal Protection 27 Oct 2014 Lim Meng Suang (Appellant)Lost	27 Oct 2014	Lim Meng Suang (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; no order as to costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Dorsey v World Sport Group: Pre-Action Interrogatories, Defamation & Breach of Confidence 13 Jan 2014 World Sport Group Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	13 Jan 2014	World Sport Group Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in its entirety and reverse the Judge’s decision to order interrogatories 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1 to be answered by Dorsey. Dorsey is to have the costs of this appeal and the proceedings below on an indemnity basis. This is in accordance with the scheme for costs provided in O 26A r 5. The usual consequential orders are to follow. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Ng Bee Keong v Ng Choon Huay: Testamentary Capacity and Validity of Wills 13 May 2013 Ng Bee Keong (Plaintiff)Won	13 May 2013	Ng Bee Keong (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedThe plaintiff's claim to uphold the Second Will was allowed.
16	Dorsey James Michael v World Sport Group: Pre-Action Interrogatories Appealability 24 Apr 2013 World Sport Group Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	24 Apr 2013	World Sport Group Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application to strike out Civil Appeal allowedApplication to strike out Civil Appeal allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
17	Wee Chiaw Sek Anna v Ng Li-Ann: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Division of Matrimonial Assets 27 Sep 2012 Ng Li-Ann Genevieve (sole executrix of the estate of Ng Hock Seng, deceased) (Defendant)Won	27 Sep 2012	Ng Li-Ann Genevieve (sole executrix of the estate of Ng Hock Seng, deceased) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Wee Siew Bock v Chan Yuen Yee: Easement Rights, Abandonment, and Interference 27 Jun 2012 Wee Siew Bock (Appellant)Lost	27 Jun 2012	Wee Siew Bock (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Khoh Chen Yeh Shane v Seng Realty: Share Transfer Dispute under Companies Act 11 Apr 2012 National Aerated Water Company Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	11 Apr 2012	National Aerated Water Company Pte Ltd (Defendant): WonThe court dismissed the plaintiff’s prayer to compel National Aerated to register the share transfer and deliver new share certificates.
20	Chia Foong Lin v Chan Yuen Yee: Easement Dispute over Kerb Wall, Gate, Parking & Use of Private Road 11 Dec 2011 Wee Siew Bock (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Dec 2011	Wee Siew Bock (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' claim dismissed with costs to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	AQT v AQU: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Wife & Children Maintenance 26 May 2011 AQT (Husband)Partial	26 May 2011	AQT (Husband): Division of matrimonial assets and maintenance orders madeHusband received 65% of the Other Matrimonial Assets (S$671,946.03) and 55% of the Matrimonial Home (S$733,096.40) less lump sum maintenance to the wife. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Ching Chew Weng Paul v Ching Pui Sim: Setting Aside Judgment for Fraud in Trust Asset Recovery 27 Mar 2011 Deborah Barker (Defendant)Lost	27 Mar 2011	Deborah Barker (Defendant): Applications dismissed with costsThe applications to set aside the judgment were dismissed with costs of $40,000 excluding disbursements.
23	Yap v Tan: Stay of Proceedings & Anti-Suit Injunction in Partnership Dispute 10 Jan 2011 Tan Peng Quee (Defendant, Appellant)Won	10 Jan 2011	Tan Peng Quee (Defendant, Appellant): Stay of Proceedings GrantedThe defendant's application for a stay of proceedings was granted.
24	City Ken v Comfortdelgro: Profit-Sharing Dispute in Motor Vehicle Repair Contract 21 Jan 2010 City Ken Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Jan 2010	City Ken Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claims for $1,785,786.72 and $11,053.24 were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
25	ABB v Sher Hock Guan: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Contractual Terms in Competitor Assistance 05 Jul 2009 Sher Hock Guan Charles (Defendant)Lost	05 Jul 2009	Sher Hock Guan Charles (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the defendant for either damages to be assessed or an account of the defendant’s profits to be taken, at the election of the second and third plaintiffs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
26	Peters Roger May v Pinder Lillian Gek Lian: Domicile Dispute & Estate Duty 16 Apr 2009 Pinder Lillian Gek Lian (Respondent, Caveator)Lost	16 Apr 2009	Pinder Lillian Gek Lian (Respondent, Caveator): Application DeniedThe caveator's objection to the notation was denied as the court found that the deceased died domiciled in Singapore.
27	Gao Bin v OCBC Securities: Summary Judgment, Anti-Setoff Clause & Unfair Contract Terms Act 19 Oct 2008 Gao Bin (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	19 Oct 2008	Gao Bin (Plaintiff, Appellant): Leave to defend granted on conditionPlaintiff was granted leave to defend the SBL Claim on the condition that he pays the sum of $1,470,469.33 into court or by way of a banker’s guarantee satisfactory to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	Law Society v Nor'ain Abu Bakar: Lawyers' Misconduct in Deceiving Court over Release of Funds 07 Oct 2008 Peter Chua Seng Hock (Respondent)Lost	07 Oct 2008	Peter Chua Seng Hock (Respondent): Struck off the rollPeter Chua Seng Hock was struck off the roll.
29	ComfortDelGro Engineering v City Ken: Dispute over Automobile Repair Contract and Amendment of Claim 03 Feb 2008 City Ken Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	03 Feb 2008	City Ken Pte Ltd (Defendant): Costs order review sought but application dismissedDefendant sought a review of the costs order, but the application was dismissed.
30	Dynamic Investments v Lee Chee Kian: Collective Sale Dispute over Strata Title Distribution 12 Dec 2007 Sim Hock Cheng (Defendant, Respondent)Won	12 Dec 2007	Sim Hock Cheng (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld with costs to the respondent. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
31	NK v NL: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Wife Maintenance, Child Custody & Welfare 18 Jul 2007 NL (Respondent)Partial	18 Jul 2007	NL (Respondent): Appeal partially unsuccessfulAppeal partially unsuccessful. The court adjusted the division of matrimonial assets in the wife's favor, but affirmed the maintenance order and custody arrangements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
32	Abe Isaac (Pte) Ltd v Marieta Montalba Pacudan: Lease Agreement Dispute over Property Condition 29 Mar 2007 Abe Isaac (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Mar 2007	Abe Isaac (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the plaintiff for arrears of rental, loss of rental, and indemnity claims, with nominal damages awarded for the reinstatement and inventory list claims. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
33	Peters Roger May v Pinder Lillian Gek Lian: Forum Non Conveniens & Domicile in Probate Proceedings 05 Mar 2006 Pinder Lillian Gek Lian (Respondent)Lost	05 Mar 2006	Pinder Lillian Gek Lian (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe respondent's application to stay the notation proceedings was dismissed.
34	Alagappa Subramanian v Chidambaram: Family Account Dispute & Overdrawn Funds 05 May 2003 Chidambaram s/o Alagappa (Respondent)Partial	05 May 2003	Chidambaram s/o Alagappa (Respondent): Orders set aside in partOrders in favor of Chidambaram were set aside in part.
35	Colombo Dockyard v. Metro Maritime: Recovery of Funds & Illegality in Contract 06 Dec 2002 Colombo Dockyard Limited (Plaintiff)Won	06 Dec 2002	Colombo Dockyard Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of US$649,187.50, plus interest at 6% per annum from the date of writ until date of judgment. The court also declared that the defendant is holding the said sum of US$649,187.50 upon trust for the plaintiffs.
36	Chidambaram v Alagappa: Trust Fund Overdraw & Estate Distribution Dispute 09 Sep 2002 Chidambaram s/o Alagappa (Plaintiff)Won	09 Sep 2002	Chidambaram s/o Alagappa (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $1,781,913.02 plus accrued interest of $872,084.07 as at 30 September 1998 and further interest on the sum of $1,781,913.02 from 30 September 1998 up to the date of full payment accruing on a monthly compounded basis at the rate of 9% per annum. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
37	DBS Bank v Bok Chee Seng: Indoor Management Rule & Authority of Company Secretary 11 Aug 2002 Development Bank of Singapore Ltd (Appellant)Won	11 Aug 2002	Development Bank of Singapore Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, reinstating the judgment of the District Court.
38	Bok Chee Seng Construction v Development Bank of Singapore: Bank Account Mandate Dispute 21 Feb 2002 Development Bank of Singapore Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	21 Feb 2002	Development Bank of Singapore Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Claim DismissedThe appeal by BCPL was allowed, and the claim against DBS was not dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
39	Universal Express LLC v Jupiter Air Ltd: Breach of Contract & Non-Competition in Courier Services 21 Feb 2002 Universal Express LLC (Plaintiff)Won	21 Feb 2002	Universal Express LLC (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).