Deborah Tan

Deborah Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Deborah Tan has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	4 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Abduction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Asylum	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Deborah Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Deborah Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Deputy Public Prosecutors	4 cases	100% of cases	Mohd Halmi v PP: Trafficking in Controlled Drugs & Presumptions under Misuse of Drugs Act(Dec 2005) PP v Mohd Halmi: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Presumptions(Aug 2005) Public Prosecutor v Selvaraju: Kidnapping, Attempted Murder, Mischief by Fire, Voluntarily Causing Hurt(Jul 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Deborah Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Unknown	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Deborah Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Unknown	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mohd Halmi v PP: Trafficking in Controlled Drugs & Presumptions under Misuse of Drugs Act 08 Dec 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	08 Dec 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeals of both appellants were dismissed, upholding the original conviction.
2	PP v Mohd Halmi: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Presumptions 11 Aug 2005 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)	11 Aug 2005	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): -
3	Public Prosecutor v Selvaraju: Kidnapping, Attempted Murder, Mischief by Fire, Voluntarily Causing Hurt 25 Jul 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	25 Jul 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was convicted on all four charges.
4	Public Prosecutor v Ng Kwang Lim: Culpable Homicide and Sentencing of Mentally Disordered Offender 28 Apr 2004 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	28 Apr 2004	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment.