Deepak Natverlal

Deepak Natverlal is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in passing off and trademarks. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and passing off.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Visitation Rights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Deepak Natverlal has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Deepak Natverlal has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Yong Koh & Partners	3 cases	50% of cases	Tang Chay Seng v Tung Yang Wee Arthur: Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Dispute(Aug 2010) Tang Chay Seng v Tung Yang Wee Arthur: Trademark Infringement & Passing Off in Pork Noodle Business(Aug 2010) AAT v AAU: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Custody, and Maintenance(Jun 2009)
Maximus Law LLC	2 cases	33% of cases	Ling Mang Khong Stanley v Teo Chee Siong: Striking Out Third Party Claim for Conspiracy & Contribution(Mar 2013) Ling Mang Khong Stanley v Teo Chee Siong: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Contract and Oppression(Jan 2011)
Bernard Rada and Lee Law Corporation	1 cases	17% of cases	CX v CY: Child Custody and Access Dispute Between Parents in Different Jurisdictions(Jul 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Deepak Natverlal's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Deepak Natverlal's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,000.00	250.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ling Mang Khong Stanley v Teo Chee Siong: Striking Out Third Party Claim for Conspiracy & Contribution 06 Mar 2013 Christopher Goh Wee Min (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	06 Mar 2013	Christopher Goh Wee Min (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe defendants' appeal against the decision to strike out their claim against the third party was dismissed.
2	Ling Mang Khong Stanley v Teo Chee Siong: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Contract and Oppression 19 Jan 2011 Teo Chee Siong (Defendant)Won	19 Jan 2011	Teo Chee Siong (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe application to strike out the Plaintiff’s Statement of Claim (Amendment No 3) under O 18 r 19 of the Rules of Court was granted as it discloses no reasonable cause of action. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tang Chay Seng v Tung Yang Wee Arthur: Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off Dispute 09 Aug 2010 Tang Chay Seng (Plaintiff)Neutral	09 Aug 2010	Tang Chay Seng (Plaintiff): Application to amend pleadings allowedThe court allowed the defendant's application to amend his pleadings and awarded costs to the plaintiff.
4	Tang Chay Seng v Tung Yang Wee Arthur: Trademark Infringement & Passing Off in Pork Noodle Business 09 Aug 2010 Tang Chay Seng (Plaintiff)Partial	09 Aug 2010	Tang Chay Seng (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partNominal damages of $1,000 awarded for loss of goodwill arising from the Lianhe Zaobao advertisement. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	AAT v AAU: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Custody, and Maintenance 07 Jun 2009 AAT (Plaintiff)Partial	07 Jun 2009	AAT (Plaintiff): Orders made for division of matrimonial assets and maintenanceOrders made for division of matrimonial assets and maintenance. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	CX v CY: Child Custody and Access Dispute Between Parents in Different Jurisdictions 18 Jul 2005 CX (Appellant)Lost	18 Jul 2005	CX (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against joint custody and overseas access orders dismissed. No orders on costs were made. Security deposit to be returned to the mother. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.