Deepak Raja

Deepak Raja is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and measure of damages. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Deepak Raja has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Practices	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Anaesthetic procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry Assessment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Sexual Abuse Allegations	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Healthcare Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Deepak Raja has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Deepak Raja has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
MyintSoe Mohamed Yang and Selvaraj	2 cases	50% of cases	Tan Harry v Teo Chee Yeow: Negligence, Damages & Inheritance in Fatal Accident Claim(Nov 2003) D v Kong Sim Guan: Defamation & Negligence in Child Sexual Abuse Assessment(Jul 2003)
MyintSoe and Selvaraj	1 cases	25% of cases	Teo Chee Yeow v Tan Harry: Determining Benefit of Co-Appellant's Successful Appeal on Damages(Jul 2004)
Myint Soe and Selvaraj	1 cases	25% of cases	Chia Yang Pong v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Disciplinary Committee's Decision on Professional Misconduct(May 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Deepak Raja's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Deepak Raja's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	3,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Teo Chee Yeow v Tan Harry: Determining Benefit of Co-Appellant's Successful Appeal on Damages 13 Jul 2004 Teo Chee Yeow Aloysius (Appellant)Lost	13 Jul 2004	Teo Chee Yeow Aloysius (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe first appellant's appeal was dismissed, and they did not receive the benefit of the second appellant's successful appeal.
2	Chia Yang Pong v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Disciplinary Committee's Decision on Professional Misconduct 30 May 2004 Chia Yang Pong (Appellant)Partial	30 May 2004	Chia Yang Pong (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal was allowed in part by reducing the fine to $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Tan Harry v Teo Chee Yeow: Negligence, Damages & Inheritance in Fatal Accident Claim 03 Nov 2003 Teo Chee Yeow Aloysius (Defendant, Respondent)Won	03 Nov 2003	Teo Chee Yeow Aloysius (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedDefendant's appeal regarding the deduction of inherited assets was allowed.
4	D v Kong Sim Guan: Defamation & Negligence in Child Sexual Abuse Assessment 30 Jul 2003 Kong Sim Guan (Defendant)Won	30 Jul 2003	Kong Sim Guan (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; Plaintiff's claims in both Suit 150/2002 (negligence) and Suit 204/2002 (defamation) were dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.