Delicia Tan

Delicia Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Delicia Tan has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Delicia Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Delicia Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Delicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Delicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Delicia Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Delicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Delicia Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Delicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Delicia Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Intermittent Explosive Disorder	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Delicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Delicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Delicia Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Delicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Delicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Delicia Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v M Krishnan: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Domestic Violence with Intermittent Explosive Disorder(May 2024) Public Prosecutor v Irwan bin Ali: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2016) Veeramani Manikam v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug Importation Conviction Allowed(Aug 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Delicia Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Delicia Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v M Krishnan: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Domestic Violence with Intermittent Explosive Disorder 14 May 2024 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	14 May 2024	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment, backdated to the date of his arrest.
2	Public Prosecutor v Irwan bin Ali: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 08 Sep 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	08 Sep 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused was found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
3	Veeramani Manikam v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Drug Importation Conviction Allowed 02 Aug 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	02 Aug 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, and the conviction was set aside.