Denise Anne Mirandah

Denise Anne Mirandah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and trademark infringement.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Denise Anne Mirandah has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and trademarks.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Denise Anne Mirandah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Denise Anne Mirandah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Denise Anne Mirandah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Denise Anne Mirandah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Trade names	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Denise Anne Mirandah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Infringement	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Denise Anne Mirandah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Registration criteria	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Denise Anne Mirandah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Distinctiveness	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Denise Anne Mirandah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Trademark Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Denise Anne Mirandah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Conflicts with earlier marks	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Denise Anne Mirandah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Denise Anne Mirandah has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Mirandah Law LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd: Trade Mark Dispute over CAESARSTONE Mark(Apr 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Denise Anne Mirandah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Denise Anne Mirandah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ceramiche Caesar SpA v Caesarstone Sdot-Yam Ltd: Trade Mark Dispute over CAESARSTONE Mark 25 Apr 2017 CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD (Respondent)Lost	25 Apr 2017	CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Respondent’s CAESARSTONE Mark shall not proceed to registration. The Respondent shall pay the Appellant its disbursements and half its costs here and below. For the avoidance of doubt, the latter includes the costs of: (a) this appeal; (b) the hearing before the Judge and; (c) the hearing before the PAR. The costs and disbursements are to be taxed if not agreed. We also make the usual consequential order for the payment out of the security. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.