Denise Tay

Denise Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and fiduciary duties. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Denise Tay has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Denise Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Denise Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Denise Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Denise Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Denise Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Denise Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Denise Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Denise Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Denise Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Denise Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Denise Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Building Management	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Denise Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Common law derivative action	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Denise Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Denise Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Denise Tay has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Infinitus Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	New Ping Ping Pauline v Eng’s Noodles House: Common Law Derivative Action, Conspiracy, Fiduciary Duty Breach(Dec 2020) MCST Plan No 4123 v Pa Guo An: Strata Title Dispute Over Glass Door Installation(Oct 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Denise Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	26.0 parties avg	6.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	26.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Denise Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	New Ping Ping Pauline v Eng’s Noodles House: Common Law Derivative Action, Conspiracy, Fiduciary Duty Breach 21 Dec 2020 Eng’s Char Siew Wantan Mee Pte Ltd (Defendant, Claimant)Won	21 Dec 2020	Eng’s Char Siew Wantan Mee Pte Ltd (Defendant, Claimant): Claim DismissedThe claim against the defendant was dismissed.
2	MCST Plan No 4123 v Pa Guo An: Strata Title Dispute Over Glass Door Installation 05 Oct 2020 The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 4123 (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	05 Oct 2020	The Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 4123 (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs to the Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 4123. The subsidiary proprietor is to seek authorization from the Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 4123 for the glass door installation at the meeting to be held on 18 September 2020. If the subsidiary proprietor fails to obtain authorization, he is to remove the glass door within two weeks of 18 September 2020 or such later date as the subsidiary proprietor and the Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 4123 might agree to. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.