Devadas Naidu

Devadas Naidu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal ethics and professional responsibility and misrepresentation. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Devadas Naidu has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial leasing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Admission to the Bar	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Oral contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Tort of Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Devadas Naidu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Devadas Naidu has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Metropolitan Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	Re Wong Wai Loong Sean: Admission of Advocates and Solicitors - Cheating in Examinations(Sep 2022)
Mohan Das Naidu & Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	Goldzone v Creative: Misrepresentation & Oral Contract Dispute in Tenancy Agreements(Apr 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Devadas Naidu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Devadas Naidu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Wong Wai Loong Sean: Admission of Advocates and Solicitors - Cheating in Examinations 25 Sep 2022 Ong Jia Yi Joleen (Applicant)Won	25 Sep 2022	Ong Jia Yi Joleen (Applicant): Application to withdraw admission allowedApplication to withdraw admission allowed subject to conditions, including undertaking not to reapply for three years.
2	Goldzone v Creative: Misrepresentation & Oral Contract Dispute in Tenancy Agreements 26 Apr 2011 Goldzone (Asia Pacific) Ltd (formerly known as Goldzone (Singapore) Ltd) (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Apr 2011	Goldzone (Asia Pacific) Ltd (formerly known as Goldzone (Singapore) Ltd) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedGoldzone's claim for rescission of the agreements, return of security deposits, rent and service charges was dismissed.