Devinder Kumar Rai

Devinder Kumar Rai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and contracts. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and building and construction contracts.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Allotment Agreement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Devinder Kumar Rai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Devinder Kumar Rai has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	1 cases	50% of cases	Legend Building Supplies v Chon Hwa Construction: Breach of Contract for Steel Rebars(Oct 2000)
ACIES Law Corporation	1 cases	50% of cases	Ding Pei Zhen v Yap Son On: Dispute over Goldrooster AG Share Distribution(Sep 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Devinder Kumar Rai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Devinder Kumar Rai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
RMB	877,715.17	877,715.171 cases	1
SGD	626,008.23	626,008.231 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ding Pei Zhen v Yap Son On: Dispute over Goldrooster AG Share Distribution 22 Sep 2015 Yap Son On (Defendant)Won	22 Sep 2015	Yap Son On (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant on the counterclaim in the sum of RMB 877,715.17. Assumed RMB as the expenses were incurred in China.
2	Legend Building Supplies v Chon Hwa Construction: Breach of Contract for Steel Rebars 29 Oct 2000 Legend Building Supplies (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Oct 2000	Legend Building Supplies (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $626,008.23 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).