Dharinni Kesavan

Dharinni Kesavan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and money-changing and remittance businesses act.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Dharinni Kesavan has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dharinni Kesavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dharinni Kesavan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dharinni Kesavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dharinni Kesavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sanctions Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dharinni Kesavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dharinni Kesavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Money-changing and Remittance Businesses Act	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dharinni Kesavan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
United Nations Act	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dharinni Kesavan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Dharinni Kesavan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Edmond Pereira Law Corporation	1 cases	100% of cases	Chinpo Shipping v Public Prosecutor: DPRK Sanctions & Remittance Business(May 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Dharinni Kesavan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Dharinni Kesavan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	80,000.00	80,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chinpo Shipping v Public Prosecutor: DPRK Sanctions & Remittance Business 11 May 2017 Chinpo Shipping Co (Pte) Ltd (Appellant)Partial	11 May 2017	Chinpo Shipping Co (Pte) Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partConviction and sentence on the DPRK Regulations Charge set aside; fine of S$80,000 paid in relation to the DPRK Regulations Charge to be refunded. Conviction on the MCRBA Charge upheld.