Diana Foo

Diana Foo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 38% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Diana Foo has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	9 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	8 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	8 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	7 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Divorce	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tertiary Educational Expenses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Diana Foo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Diana Foo has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan See Swan & Co.	8 cases	62% of cases	Abdoll Mutaleb v Public Prosecutor: Drug Importation Conspiracy & Attempted Possession(Apr 2023) Muhamad Azmi bin Kamil v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking Methamphetamine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2022) Ng Shu Yi v. Tan Yew Wei: Bankruptcy Application Dismissed Due to Debt Below Statutory Threshold(Aug 2021)
Tan Swee Swan & Co	3 cases	23% of cases	PP v Mohd Zaini: Conspiracy to Import Drugs under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jul 2019) XZ v YA: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance Dispute in Divorce Proceedings(Nov 2011) XZ v YA: Appeal for Downward Variation of Maintenance Order Based on Misrepresentation(Mar 2009)
R. Ramason & Almenoar	1 cases	8% of cases	WPK v WPJ: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance for Post-Graduate Tertiary Education(Feb 2024)
TanSwee Swan & Co	1 cases	8% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Mohd Zaini: Importation of Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Diana Foo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 5 (38%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	102.8 parties avg	2.8	77%
Partial	32.7 parties avg	2.7	23%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Diana Foo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	10(77%)	77%
Partial	3(23%)	23%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,500.00	500.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 13 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	WPK v WPJ: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance for Post-Graduate Tertiary Education 04 Feb 2024 WPK (Appellant)Lost	04 Feb 2024	WPK (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Husband's appeal against the District Judge's decision was dismissed.
2	Abdoll Mutaleb v Public Prosecutor: Drug Importation Conspiracy & Attempted Possession 25 Apr 2023 Abdoll Mutaleb bin Raffik (Appellant)Partial	25 Apr 2023	Abdoll Mutaleb bin Raffik (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partConviction on original charge substituted with a charge of attempted possession.
3	Muhamad Azmi bin Kamil v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking Methamphetamine under Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Oct 2022 Muhamad Azmi bin Kamil (Appellant)Lost	18 Oct 2022	Muhamad Azmi bin Kamil (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against his sentence of 25 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane for trafficking methamphetamine was dismissed.
4	Ng Shu Yi v. Tan Yew Wei: Bankruptcy Application Dismissed Due to Debt Below Statutory Threshold 01 Aug 2021 Ng Shu Yi (alias Wu Shuyi) (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Aug 2021	Ng Shu Yi (alias Wu Shuyi) (Plaintiff): Bankruptcy Application DismissedBankruptcy application dismissed; Plaintiff ordered to pay Defendant's costs of $1,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Public Prosecutor v Mohd Zaini: Importation of Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Apr 2020 Abdoll Mutaleb bin Raffik (Defendant)Lost	20 Apr 2020	Abdoll Mutaleb bin Raffik (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted of importing drugs.
6	PP v Mohd Zaini: Conspiracy to Import Drugs under Misuse of Drugs Act 08 Jul 2019 Abdoll Mutaleb bin Raffik (Defendant)Lost	08 Jul 2019	Abdoll Mutaleb bin Raffik (Defendant): ConvictedAbdoll Mutaleb Bin Raffik was convicted of abetment by conspiracy to import drugs.
7	Public Prosecutor v Mohd Soberi: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Jan 2019 Mohd Soberi Bin Pakari (Defendant)Lost	27 Jan 2019	Mohd Soberi Bin Pakari (Defendant): Guilty on amended chargeThe defendant was found guilty on the amended charge of possessing not less than 14.99g of diamorphine and sentenced to 26 years’ imprisonment from the date of his remand, 8 July 2016.
8	Public Prosecutor v Aishamudin: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Jan 2019 Aishamudin bin Jamaludin (Defendant)Lost	20 Jan 2019	Aishamudin bin Jamaludin (Defendant): Guilty as chargedAishamudin was found guilty of trafficking not less than 14.99g of diamorphine.
9	Ali bin Mohamad Bahashwan v Public Prosecutor: Abetment, Misuse of Drugs Act & Statutory Interpretation 04 Mar 2018 Ali bin Mohamad Bahashwan (Appellant)Lost	04 Mar 2018	Ali bin Mohamad Bahashwan (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
10	PP v Mohd Aziz: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Jan 2018 MOHD AZIZ BIN HUSSAIN (Defendant)Lost	28 Jan 2018	MOHD AZIZ BIN HUSSAIN (Defendant): Accused found guiltyAccused was found guilty of possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking.
11	Public Prosecutor v Lee Kun En: Moneylending Act & Penal Code Violations 08 Feb 2012 Lee Kun En (Respondent)Lost	08 Feb 2012	Lee Kun En (Respondent): Sentence IncreasedThe respondent's sentence was increased from 12 months to 24 months imprisonment.
12	XZ v YA: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance Dispute in Divorce Proceedings 10 Nov 2011 YA (Appellant)Partial	10 Nov 2011	YA (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part. The appeal against the division of matrimonial property was dismissed. The maintenance order was varied downwards. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	XZ v YA: Appeal for Downward Variation of Maintenance Order Based on Misrepresentation 03 Mar 2009 XZ (Appellant)Partial	03 Mar 2009	XZ (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part to the effect that the monthly maintenance payable by the appellant to the respondent was reduced by $1,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).