Dilip Kumar

Dilip Kumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in damages assessment and personal injury. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Dilip Kumar has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in damages assessment and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Damages Assessment	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dilip Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Dilip Kumar has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Yu & Co	2 cases	40% of cases	Ong Tean Hoe v Hong Kong Industrial: Personal Injury Claim & Taxation Review(Aug 2002) Ong Tean Hoe v Hong Kong Industrial: Damages for Amputation Injuries(Oct 2001)
Gavan Law Practice LLC	1 cases	20% of cases	RHB Bank Bhd v Bob TX Food Empire: Winding Up Order Based on Insolvency(Dec 2024)
Dilip Kumar Associates	1 cases	20% of cases	HSBC v Valuezy: Lease Agreement Dispute over Unpaid Rent and Damages(May 2010)
J Koh & Co	1 cases	20% of cases	Seng Hock Heng Contractor v Hup Seng Bee Construction: Injunction Against Performance Bond Call(Jul 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Dilip Kumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	53.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Dilip Kumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	798,566.49	399,283.252 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	RHB Bank Bhd v Bob TX Food Empire: Winding Up Order Based on Insolvency 17 Dec 2024 Valusports Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	17 Dec 2024	Valusports Pte Ltd (Defendant): Winding-up order madeWinding-up order made against Valusports Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	HSBC v Valuezy: Lease Agreement Dispute over Unpaid Rent and Damages 30 May 2010 Valuezy Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	30 May 2010	Valuezy Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Tenant's appeal was dismissed, and they are liable for the assessed damages of $798,566.49. This amount includes outstanding rent. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
3	Ong Tean Hoe v Hong Kong Industrial: Personal Injury Claim & Taxation Review 23 Aug 2002 Hong Kong Industrial Company Private Limited (Defendant)Lost	23 Aug 2002	Hong Kong Industrial Company Private Limited (Defendant): Review of taxation dismissedDefendant's review of taxation was dismissed.
4	Seng Hock Heng Contractor v Hup Seng Bee Construction: Injunction Against Performance Bond Call 16 Jul 2002 Seng Hock Heng Contractor Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Jul 2002	Seng Hock Heng Contractor Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application for an injunction was dismissed.
5	Ong Tean Hoe v Hong Kong Industrial: Damages for Amputation Injuries 09 Oct 2001 Hong Kong Industrial Company Private Limited (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	09 Oct 2001	Hong Kong Industrial Company Private Limited (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedDefendant's appeal against the quantification of damages was dismissed.