Dinesh Dhillon

Dinesh Dhillon is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 21 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in minority oppression and costs. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 24% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated expertise across 83 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	17 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	9 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	7 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transactions at an undervalue	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting Standards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation of Funds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Singapore International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Comity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs against non-party	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint and several liability for costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rectification	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Discovery Obligations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Material non-disclosure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority shareholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lease Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agreements to stifle prosecution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Endeavours Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transaction at Undervalue	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fixed term contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Notice period	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reasonable notice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Directors and Officers Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interrogatories	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dinesh Dhillon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Dinesh Dhillon has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	14 cases	67% of cases	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Costs Against Non-Party(Dec 2021) Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation(Dec 2021) Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in DyStar(Jun 2021)
Wong & Leow LLC	5 cases	24% of cases	Aloe Vera v Asianic: Enforcing Foreign Arbitration Award in Singapore(May 2006) Asian Corporate Services v Eastwest Management: Anton Piller Order & Conspiracy(Jan 2006) Mercator & Noordstar NV v Velstra Pte Ltd: Winding Up & Transaction at Undervalue(Sep 2003)
Allen and Gledhill LLP	1 cases	5% of cases	UDL Marine v Jurong Town Corp: Proprietary Estoppel & Lease Renewal Dispute(Jan 2011)
Allen & Gledhill	1 cases	5% of cases	Tullett Prebon v Spring: Interrogatories, Confidentiality, and Freedom of Speech(May 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Dinesh Dhillon's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 5 (24%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	84.8 parties avg	4.8	38%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	5%
Partial	53.8 parties avg	3.8	24%
Settled	12.0 parties avg	2.0	5%
Won	62.7 parties avg	2.7	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2007	28.0 parties avg	8.0
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2013	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	43.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Dinesh Dhillon's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(38%)	38%
Neutral	1(5%)	5%
Partial	5(24%)	24%
Settled	1(5%)	5%
Won	6(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	13,471,986.68	1,036,306.6713 cases	13
USD	486,680,000.00	243,340,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Settled: 1 cases (33.3%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 21 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Costs Against Non-Party 26 Dec 2021 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Dec 2021	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Application deniedKiri's application to make Longsheng jointly and severally liable for Senda's costs was denied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 07 Dec 2021 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	07 Dec 2021	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Costs awardedCosts of S$4,960,815.26 and disbursements of S$3,100,826.85 awarded to Kiri Industries Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in DyStar 20 Jun 2021 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	20 Jun 2021	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Valuation of shares determinedFinal valuation of Kiri's shares adjudged to be US$481.6m.
4	Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation & Oppression 02 Jun 2021 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Neutral	02 Jun 2021	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Shares to be valuedShares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd to be valued (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Share Valuation 20 Dec 2020 Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	20 Dec 2020	Kiri Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Shares to be purchased by DefendantSenda International Capital Ltd was ordered to purchase Kiri Industries Ltd’s shares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd. The final amount is to be determined based on the adjustments outlined in the judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Mukherjee Amitava v Dystar Global Holdings: Director's Right to Inspect Company Records under Companies Act 05 Sep 2018 Mukherjee Amitava (Appellant)Partial	05 Sep 2018	Mukherjee Amitava (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed against the company, but dismissed regarding the joinder of the Longsheng directors. Costs awarded for the proceedings below and the appeal in favour of the appellant and against the Company in the aggregate sum of $30,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	ARS v ART: Tortious Interference, Breach of Contract, and Conspiracy in CCTV Supply Dispute 07 Apr 2015 ART (Defendant)Won	07 Apr 2015	ART (Defendant): Claims dismissedThe claims against the defendant were dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	UDL Marine v Jurong Town Corp: Lease Renewal Dispute over Waterfront Redevelopment 06 Nov 2013 Jurong Town Corporation (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	06 Nov 2013	Jurong Town Corporation (Defendant, Plaintiff): Claim AllowedJTC's claim against UDL Marine was allowed for double rent, reinstatement costs, and rent for the reinstatement period, totaling $1,109,419.76 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Visionhealthone v HD Holdings: Conspiracy, Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Joint Venture Dispute 01 Sep 2013 Visionhealthone Corp Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	01 Sep 2013	Visionhealthone Corp Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in respect of the tort of unlawful act conspiracy on the part of HPPL and LCL. Damages representing S$2.125m to be paid jointly by HPPL and LCL. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	VisionHealthOne v HD Holdings: Conspiracy, Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim 23 Jul 2012 Visionhealthone Corp Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	23 Jul 2012	Visionhealthone Corp Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for $2.125m was dismissed due to insufficient evidence. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	AJU v AJT: Setting Aside Interim Award Based on Illegality of Concluding Agreement 21 Aug 2011 AJT (Respondent)Lost	21 Aug 2011	AJT (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs here and below as well as the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	UDL Marine v Jurong Town Corp: Proprietary Estoppel & Lease Renewal Dispute 02 Jan 2011 Jurong Town Corp (Defendant)Lost	02 Jan 2011	Jurong Town Corp (Defendant): Application to strike out Statement of Claim DismissedDefendant’s striking out application in Summons 5748 of 2010 is dismissed.
13	Xing Rong Pte Ltd v Visionhealthone: Appeal on Discovery Order for Joint Venture Funds 25 Aug 2010 Visionhealthone Corporation Pte Ltd (Respondent)Partial	25 Aug 2010	Visionhealthone Corporation Pte Ltd (Respondent): Partial WinSuccessfully defended the Discovery Order, but lost the striking out application appeal.
14	AJT v AJU: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Illegality and Public Policy 15 Jul 2010 AJT (Plaintiff)Won	15 Jul 2010	AJT (Plaintiff): Application to set aside the Award allowedApplication to set aside the Award allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Travista Development v Tan Kim Swee: Breach of Contract & 'Best Endeavours' in Property Sale 30 Dec 2007 Travista Development Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	30 Dec 2007	Travista Development Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs and the usual consequential orders. The judgment does not specify a monetary amount. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
16	Tullett Prebon v Spring: Interrogatories, Confidentiality, and Freedom of Speech 16 May 2007 BGC International (Singapore Branch) (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	16 May 2007	BGC International (Singapore Branch) (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with no order as to costs.
17	Aloe Vera v Asianic: Enforcing Foreign Arbitration Award in Singapore 09 May 2006 Aloe Vera of America, Inc (Plaintiff)Lost	09 May 2006	Aloe Vera of America, Inc (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
18	Asian Corporate Services v Eastwest Management: Anton Piller Order & Conspiracy 15 Jan 2006 Asian Corporate Services (SEA) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	15 Jan 2006	Asian Corporate Services (SEA) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the appellant shall have the costs here and below, with the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Mercator & Noordstar NV v Velstra Pte Ltd: Winding Up & Transaction at Undervalue 22 Sep 2003 Mercator & Noordstar NV (Appellant)Partial	22 Sep 2003	Mercator & Noordstar NV (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in partAppeal allowed in part relating to the substantive issue. The court declared that the plaintiff has not proven that the payment of US$5,080,000 made by Velstra to Mercator on 5 January 2000 constitutes a transaction at an undervalue within the meaning of s 98 of the Bankruptcy Act read with s 329 of the Companies Act. The appellant has not succeeded on the issue of “transaction”, it shall only be entitled to 60% of the costs, here and below. Appeal on the procedural matter dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Walsh v Peregrine: Wrongful Termination & Fixed-Term Contract Dispute 28 May 2003 Peregrine Systems Pte Ltd (Defendant)Settled	28 May 2003	Peregrine Systems Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim SettledCounterclaim withdrawn with no order as to costs; TWW agreed to pay PSPL $924.81 by 31 December 2003. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Velstra Pte Ltd v Mercator & Noordstar NV: Avoidance of Transactions at Undervalue under Insolvency Law 23 Feb 2003 Mercator & Noordstar NV (Defendant)Lost	23 Feb 2003	Mercator & Noordstar NV (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court dismissed the defendant's arguments and ordered them to return the US$5.08 million to the plaintiffs. Assumed USD, as the payment was made in USD.