Doris Damaris Lee

Doris Damaris Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and director's duties. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Doris Damaris Lee has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in fiduciary duties and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Doris Damaris Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Doris Damaris Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Doris Damaris Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Doris Damaris Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Doris Damaris Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Doris Damaris Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Doris Damaris Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Doris Damaris Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Doris Damaris Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Doris Damaris Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Doris Damaris Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Doris Damaris Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Doris Damaris Lee has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hee Theng Fong & Co	2 cases	67% of cases	Kea Holdings v Gan Boon Hock: Breach of Director's Duties & Fraudulent Misrepresentation(Jul 2000) KEA Holdings v Gan Boon Hock: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Termination Dispute(Jan 2000)
M/s Hee Theng Fong & Co	1 cases	33% of cases	Hup Huat Food Industries v Liang Chiang Heng: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Trademark Infringement(Oct 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Doris Damaris Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Doris Damaris Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2
USD	155,220.00	155,220.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hup Huat Food Industries v Liang Chiang Heng: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Trademark Infringement 16 Oct 2003 Hup Huat Food Industries (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Oct 2003	Hup Huat Food Industries (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claims against all defendants were dismissed with costs, except for the claim against the fifth defendant for S$158,331.75. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Kea Holdings v Gan Boon Hock: Breach of Director's Duties & Fraudulent Misrepresentation 02 Jul 2000 Kea Resources Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	02 Jul 2000	Kea Resources Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; Gan is ordered to pay US$77,610.
3	KEA Holdings v Gan Boon Hock: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Termination Dispute 13 Jan 2000 Kea Resources Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	13 Jan 2000	Kea Resources Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.