Dube Vinod Kumar

Dube Vinod Kumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and restructuring and dissolution. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in insolvency law and restructuring and dissolution.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Insolvency Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Voluntary Arrangement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Interim Order	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Court Order	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dube Vinod Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Dube Vinod Kumar has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Whitefield Law Corporation	2 cases	67% of cases	RHB Bank Bhd v Bob TX Food Empire: Winding Up Order Based on Insolvency(Dec 2024) Yap Shiaw Wei v RHB Bank Bhd: Bankruptcy Application & Interim Order for Voluntary Arrangement(Sep 2024)
Peter Chua & Partners	1 cases	33% of cases	Law Society v Nor'ain Abu Bakar: Lawyers' Misconduct in Deceiving Court over Release of Funds(Oct 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Dube Vinod Kumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.2 parties avg	4.2	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	24.3 parties avg	4.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Dube Vinod Kumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	RHB Bank Bhd v Bob TX Food Empire: Winding Up Order Based on Insolvency 17 Dec 2024 Valusports Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	17 Dec 2024	Valusports Pte Ltd (Defendant): Winding-up order madeWinding-up order made against Valusports Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Yap Shiaw Wei v RHB Bank Bhd: Bankruptcy Application & Interim Order for Voluntary Arrangement 09 Sep 2024 Yap Shiaw Wei (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	09 Sep 2024	Yap Shiaw Wei (Applicant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the decision of the learned Assistant Registrar Tan Ee Kuan dismissing an application by the appellant in HC/OSB 47/2024 for an interim order pursuant to Part 14 of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act 2018 (2020 Rev Ed) (the “IRDA”) in order to facilitate consideration of a proposed voluntary arrangement was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Law Society v Nor'ain Abu Bakar: Lawyers' Misconduct in Deceiving Court over Release of Funds 07 Oct 2008 Peter Chua Seng Hock (Respondent)Lost	07 Oct 2008	Peter Chua Seng Hock (Respondent): Struck off the rollPeter Chua Seng Hock was struck off the roll.