Dwayne Tan

Dwayne Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in receivership and defamation.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Dwayne Tan has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Qualified Privilege	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Dwayne Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Dwayne Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chor Pee & Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	Silver Stream v Ong: Partnership Dissolution & Account Dispute(Jul 2000)
Chor Pee and Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	Yeo Nai Meng v Ei-Nets Ltd: Defamation & Wrongful Dismissal over Accounting Irregularities(May 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Dwayne Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	100%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Dwayne Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Partial	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,821,031.11	910,515.562 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yeo Nai Meng v Ei-Nets Ltd: Defamation & Wrongful Dismissal over Accounting Irregularities 08 May 2003 Liau Beng Chye (Defendant)Partial	08 May 2003	Liau Beng Chye (Defendant): Claim Dismissed in partClaim dismissed in part. The court found that the communication by LBC of the 3 Reports to the directors of Ei-Nets was covered by qualified privilege.
2	Silver Stream v Ong: Partnership Dissolution & Account Dispute 23 Jul 2000 Ong Kay Eng (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	23 Jul 2000	Ong Kay Eng (Defendant, Appellant): Claim DismissedDefendant's claim against the Third Party dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).