Edmund Koh

Edmund Koh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in banking and finance and estate administration. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Edmund Koh has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legitimate Expectation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Discovery Obligations	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Financial Crisis	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Differential Premium Assessment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Credit-linked notes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Land Acquisition	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmund Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Edmund Koh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	4 cases	80% of cases	ADG v ADI: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Failure to Present Case & Breach of Natural Justice(Apr 2014) Chiu Teng v SLA: Judicial Review of Differential Premium Assessment for Lifting Title Restrictions(Nov 2013) Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Unauthorized Equity Accumulators & Bank's Discovery Obligations(May 2013)
Wong Partnership LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	Pacific Harbor Advisors v Tiny Tantono: Examination of Judgment Debtor & Scope of Questioning(Jan 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Edmund Koh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.4 parties avg	4.4	80%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	34.9 parties avg	4.9
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Edmund Koh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Partial	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	175,000.00	58,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Pacific Harbor Advisors v Tiny Tantono: Examination of Judgment Debtor & Scope of Questioning 18 Jan 2015 LIM Asia Multi-Strategy Fund Inc (Plaintiff, Judgment Creditor)Partial	18 Jan 2015	LIM Asia Multi-Strategy Fund Inc (Plaintiff, Judgment Creditor): Examination of judgment debtor limitedThe Judgment Creditor is not permitted to ask questions concerning the historical aspect of the estate of the deceased even if such questions have a nexus to the property that the estate has wheresoever situated.
2	ADG v ADI: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Failure to Present Case & Breach of Natural Justice 14 Apr 2014 Second plaintiff (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Apr 2014	Second plaintiff (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Chiu Teng v SLA: Judicial Review of Differential Premium Assessment for Lifting Title Restrictions 26 Nov 2013 Chiu Teng @ Kallang Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	26 Nov 2013	Chiu Teng @ Kallang Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for judicial review dismissed; applicant to pay costs of the SLA and Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Teo Wai Cheong v Crédit Industriel et Commercial: Unauthorized Equity Accumulators & Bank's Discovery Obligations 16 May 2013 Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Respondent)Lost	16 May 2013	Crédit Industriel et Commercial (Respondent): Claims dismissedThe Bank’s claims against Teo are dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Morgan Stanley v Hong Leong Finance: Anti-Suit Injunction & Pinnacle Notes Failure 18 Apr 2013 Morgan Stanley & Co LLC (formerly known as Morgan Stanley & Co Incorporated) (Plaintiff)Lost	18 Apr 2013	Morgan Stanley & Co LLC (formerly known as Morgan Stanley & Co Incorporated) (Plaintiff): Application RefusedThe plaintiffs' application for an anti-suit injunction was refused, and they were ordered to pay costs of $35,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.