Edmund Lam

Edmund Lam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Edmund Lam has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and confessions.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmund Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Confessions	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Edmund Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmund Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edmund Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edmund Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Edmund Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edmund Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmund Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edmund Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edmund Lam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edmund Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Consent of Public Prosecutor	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edmund Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Edmund Lam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
False Declaration	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edmund Lam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Edmund Lam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	100% of cases	PP v Ang Seng Thor: Corruption Offences, Prevention of Corruption Act, Corporate Governance(May 2011) PP v Sarle Steepan: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Infant Death(Sep 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Edmund Lam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Edmund Lam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Ang Seng Thor: Corruption Offences, Prevention of Corruption Act, Corporate Governance 25 May 2011 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	25 May 2011	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the sentence was varied to a term of six weeks’ imprisonment and a fine of $25,000 per charge.
2	PP v Sarle Steepan: Culpable Homicide Sentencing for Infant Death 14 Sep 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	14 Sep 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 18 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane.