Edward Ti

Edward Ti is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and conflict of interest.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Edward Ti has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edward Ti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Edward Ti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edward Ti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Edward Ti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edward Ti has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edward Ti has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edward Ti has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Edward Ti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Edward Ti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edward Ti has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edward Ti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Edward Ti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Fiduciary duties	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Edward Ti has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Tender Process	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Edward Ti has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Gratification	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edward Ti has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Edward Ti has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	100% of cases	Teo Chu Ha v PP: Corruption Appeal - Gratification & Conflict of Interest in Seagate Trucking Contracts(Sep 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Edward Ti's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Edward Ti's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Teo Chu Ha v PP: Corruption Appeal - Gratification & Conflict of Interest in Seagate Trucking Contracts 17 Sep 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	17 Sep 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Charges not made outAll 12 charges of corruption under s 6(a) of the PCA have not been made out.