Edwin Loo

Edwin Loo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and legal malpractice. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Edwin Loo has demonstrated expertise across 38 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and succession law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Gifts Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inter vivos gift	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation of Funds	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mentally disordered offenders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Distribution of assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abnormality of Mind	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Distribution Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
HDB Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Loo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Edwin Loo has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Leonard Loo & Co	3 cases	43% of cases	Tan Chui Lian v Neo Liew Eng: Resulting Trusts, HDB Flats, and Division of Sale Proceeds(Nov 2006) Tang Eng Seng v Tang Boon Kiat Eugene: Inter Vivos Gift & Estate Distribution(Sep 2003) Healthy Living Marketing v Jeanrich Marketing: Breach of Contract & Termination of Sole Agency for Bionaire Fans(Oct 2002)
Leonard Loo and Co	3 cases	43% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Kok Weng Shang Bernard: Culpable Homicide and Mental Disorder Sentencing(Mar 2005) DM Divers Technics v Tee Chin Hock: Director's Fiduciary Duty & Limitation Act(Aug 2004) Chew Kim Kee v Kertar and Co: Negligence Claim for Failure to Advise on Appeal Deadline in Matrimonial Asset Division(May 2004)
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	14% of cases	PP v Sharom bin Ahmad: Trafficking Diamorphine & Criminal Conspiracy(Apr 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Edwin Loo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.9 parties avg	2.9	71%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Edwin Loo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(71%)	71%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1.00	0.254 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Chui Lian v Neo Liew Eng: Resulting Trusts, HDB Flats, and Division of Sale Proceeds 14 Nov 2006 Tan Chui Lian (Plaintiff)Won	14 Nov 2006	Tan Chui Lian (Plaintiff): Application GrantedPlaintiff's application to have the flat sold and proceeds divided was granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Public Prosecutor v Kok Weng Shang Bernard: Culpable Homicide and Mental Disorder Sentencing 31 Mar 2005 Kok Weng Shang Bernard (Defendant)Lost	31 Mar 2005	Kok Weng Shang Bernard (Defendant): Accused sentenced to imprisonment for lifeAccused sentenced to imprisonment for life.
3	DM Divers Technics v Tee Chin Hock: Director's Fiduciary Duty & Limitation Act 30 Aug 2004 Tee Chin Hock (Defendant)Lost	30 Aug 2004	Tee Chin Hock (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim is dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
4	Chew Kim Kee v Kertar and Co: Negligence Claim for Failure to Advise on Appeal Deadline in Matrimonial Asset Division 07 May 2004 Chew Kim Kee (Plaintiff)Lost	07 May 2004	Chew Kim Kee (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Tang Eng Seng v Tang Boon Kiat Eugene: Inter Vivos Gift & Estate Distribution 08 Sep 2003 Tang Bee Lay Margaret (Plaintiff)Lost	08 Sep 2003	Tang Bee Lay Margaret (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs’ claim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Healthy Living Marketing v Jeanrich Marketing: Breach of Contract & Termination of Sole Agency for Bionaire Fans 13 Oct 2002 Jeanrich Marketing Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	13 Oct 2002	Jeanrich Marketing Pte Ltd (Defendant): Account of Profits Ordered, Damages AwardedThe Defendant is ordered to render an account of profits made from the sale of fans after the termination date and to pay such profits to the Plaintiff, with interest at the statutory rate. The Defendant is also ordered to pay damages of $1 for breach of the non-competition clause and to pay the Plaintiff's costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	PP v Sharom bin Ahmad: Trafficking Diamorphine & Criminal Conspiracy 13 Apr 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	13 Apr 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Guilty verdictThe Public Prosecutor won the case against both accused.