Edwina Fan

Edwina Fan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and personal injury. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Edwina Fan has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in negligence and evidence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Negligence	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Occupiers' Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Industrial Accident	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Double Insurance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contribution and Average	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Parol Evidence Rule	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Premises Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwina Fan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Edwina Fan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kelvin Chia Partnership	3 cases	60% of cases	Sim Cheng Soon v BT Engineering: Employer's Duty of Care for Workplace Safety(Nov 2006) Sim Cheng Soon v BT Engineering: Employee Injury & Breach of Factories Act(Dec 2005) China Insurance v Liberty Insurance: Double Insurance & Contribution Claims(Feb 2005)
United Legal Alliance LLC	2 cases	40% of cases	Pollmann v Ye: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Cycling Accident(Oct 2017) Abdul Hadi bin Hamdan v Goldin Enterprise: Interpretation of Work Injury Compensation Act(Sep 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Edwina Fan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.3 parties avg	3.3	60%
Won	22.7 parties avg	2.7	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	23.7 parties avg	3.7
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Edwina Fan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Pollmann v Ye: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Cycling Accident 01 Oct 2017 Ye Xianrong (Defendant)Lost	01 Oct 2017	Ye Xianrong (Defendant): Defendant is 100% liable for the plaintiff’s injuriesDefendant is 100% liable for the plaintiff’s loss and damage. Those damages shall be assessed separately (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Abdul Hadi bin Hamdan v Goldin Enterprise: Interpretation of Work Injury Compensation Act 16 Sep 2012 Goldin Enterprise Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	16 Sep 2012	Goldin Enterprise Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe defendant successfully defended the appeal.
3	Sim Cheng Soon v BT Engineering: Employer's Duty of Care for Workplace Safety 15 Nov 2006 Keppel Shipyard Limited (Respondent)Lost	15 Nov 2006	Keppel Shipyard Limited (Respondent): Liability ApportionedLiable for 40% of the damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Sim Cheng Soon v BT Engineering: Employee Injury & Breach of Factories Act 04 Dec 2005 Keppel Shipyard Ltd (Defendant)Won	04 Dec 2005	Keppel Shipyard Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	China Insurance v Liberty Insurance: Double Insurance & Contribution Claims 27 Feb 2005 China Insurance Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Feb 2005	China Insurance Co (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application for contribution was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.