Ee Chong Nam Andrew

Ee Chong Nam Andrew is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ee Chong Nam Andrew has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and misrepresentation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ee Chong Nam Andrew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ee Chong Nam Andrew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Ee Chong Nam Andrew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ee Chong Nam Andrew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ee Chong Nam Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ee Chong Nam Andrew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Mistake of Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ee Chong Nam Andrew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Appropriation of Payment	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ee Chong Nam Andrew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Good Consideration	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ee Chong Nam Andrew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ee Chong Nam Andrew has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Andrew Ee & Co	1 cases	100% of cases	Mok Kwong Yue v Ding Leng Kong: Mistake of Law, Loan Repayment Dispute(May 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ee Chong Nam Andrew's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ee Chong Nam Andrew's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mok Kwong Yue v Ding Leng Kong: Mistake of Law, Loan Repayment Dispute 05 May 2008 Mok Kwong Yue (Plaintiff)Lost	05 May 2008	Mok Kwong Yue (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for recovery of overpayment dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.