Ee Jia Min

Ee Jia Min is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and civil procedure. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 67% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ee Jia Min has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ee Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ee Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ee Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ee Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ee Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ee Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ee Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ee Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ee Jia Min has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ee Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Liquidator Appointment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ee Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ee Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Legal Advice Privilege	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ee Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ee Jia Min has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ee Jia Min has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ee Jia Min has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Rashmi Bothra v SuntecCity Thirty: Winding Up & Liquidator Appointment Dispute(Nov 2023) RB Investments v Kardachi: Legal Advice Privilege & Bankruptcy Investigation(Sep 2023) Trinity Construction v Sinohydro: Striking Out & Stay of Proceedings in Arbitration Dispute(Oct 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ee Jia Min's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 2 (67%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ee Jia Min's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rashmi Bothra v SuntecCity Thirty: Winding Up & Liquidator Appointment Dispute 07 Nov 2023 Patrick Bance (Respondent)Lost	07 Nov 2023	Patrick Bance (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed against the appointment of their nominees as liquidators.
2	RB Investments v Kardachi: Legal Advice Privilege & Bankruptcy Investigation 28 Sep 2023 Patrick Bance (Respondent)Won	28 Sep 2023	Patrick Bance (Respondent): Successful in opposing applicationSuccessfully opposed RBI's application to expunge documents.
3	Trinity Construction v Sinohydro: Striking Out & Stay of Proceedings in Arbitration Dispute 06 Oct 2020 Trinity Construction Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	06 Oct 2020	Trinity Construction Development Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Striking out application dismissed, Suit stayedThe striking out application was dismissed, but the suit was stayed pending resolution of the arbitration between the parties.