Eileen Yeo

Eileen Yeo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and ponzi schemes. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Eileen Yeo has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and misrepresentation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Termination	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Ponzi Schemes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Letter of Credit Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pyramid Schemes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducing Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fictitious Purchase Scheme	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Due inquiry	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eileen Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Eileen Yeo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Advocatus Law LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Chan Pik Sun v Wan Hoe Keet: Conspiracy, Misrepresentation in Ponzi Scheme(Apr 2023) Bank of China v BP Singapore: Negligence, Fraud & Letter of Credit Dispute(May 2021) Ocean Tankers v Rajah & Tann: Striking Out Injunction Actions Due to Lack of Standing(Feb 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Eileen Yeo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 2 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Eileen Yeo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Neutral	1(20%)	20%
Partial	2(40%)	40%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	23,954.22	11,977.112 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chan Pik Sun v Wan Hoe Keet: Conspiracy, Misrepresentation in Ponzi Scheme 13 Apr 2023 Strategic Wealth Consultancy Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	13 Apr 2023	Strategic Wealth Consultancy Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; all claims against them were dismissed.
2	Bank of China v BP Singapore: Negligence, Fraud & Letter of Credit Dispute 30 May 2021 Lim Huey Ching (Defendant)Neutral	30 May 2021	Lim Huey Ching (Defendant): NeutralWatching brief.
3	Ocean Tankers v Rajah & Tann: Striking Out Injunction Actions Due to Lack of Standing 24 Feb 2021 Hin Leong Trading (Pte) Ltd (under judicial management) (Applicant)Lost	24 Feb 2021	Hin Leong Trading (Pte) Ltd (under judicial management) (Applicant): Application DismissedInjunction action struck out.
4	Long Kim Wing v LTX-Credence: Costs Allocation After Judgment on Claims and Counterclaims 06 Dec 2017 Long Kim Wing (Plaintiff, Defendant-in-Counterclaim)Partial	06 Dec 2017	Long Kim Wing (Plaintiff, Defendant-in-Counterclaim): Judgment against the Defendant for $5,512.98 and $12,928.26Judgment against the Defendant for $5,512.98 and $12,928.26 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Long Kim Wing v LTX-Credence: Wrongful Dismissal, Misconduct, and Due Inquiry 29 Jun 2017 Long Kim Wing (Plaintiff, Defendant-in-Counterclaim)Partial	29 Jun 2017	Long Kim Wing (Plaintiff, Defendant-in-Counterclaim): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for Plaintiff for failure to conduct due inquiry; awarded seven days' salary (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).