Elengovan Krishnan

Elengovan Krishnan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and winding up. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Trading	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Full and Frank Disclosure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Oppression	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Elengovan Krishnan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Elengovan Krishnan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
P Suppiah and Co	4 cases	100% of cases	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Fraudulent Trading & Winding Up Dispute(May 2005) Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Directors' Liability for Company Debts under Companies Act s 340(1)(Sep 2004) Naidu Rajasimha v Naidu Sathyamurthi: Resulting Trusts & Beneficial Ownership Dispute(Jun 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Elengovan Krishnan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 4 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	44.4 parties avg	4.4	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	34.5 parties avg	4.5
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Elengovan Krishnan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,000.00	3,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Fraudulent Trading & Winding Up Dispute 12 May 2005 Tang Yoke Kheng (trading as Niklex Supply Co) (Appellant)Lost	12 May 2005	Tang Yoke Kheng (trading as Niklex Supply Co) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal was dismissed as the court was satisfied that the appellant had not discharged her burden of proof, and the trial judge was not wrong to have rejected the allegations of fraud.
2	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Directors' Liability for Company Debts under Companies Act s 340(1) 26 Sep 2004 Tang Yoke Kheng (trading as Niklex Supply Co) (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Sep 2004	Tang Yoke Kheng (trading as Niklex Supply Co) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for fraudulent trading was dismissed.
3	Naidu Rajasimha v Naidu Sathyamurthi: Resulting Trusts & Beneficial Ownership Dispute 09 Jun 2004 Naidu Veeraraghava (Plaintiff)Lost	09 Jun 2004	Naidu Veeraraghava (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiffs' action is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Tang Yoke Kheng v Lek Benedict: Injunctions, Full Disclosure, and Companies Act Violations 27 Apr 2004 Tang Yoke Kheng (trading as Niklex Supply Co) (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Apr 2004	Tang Yoke Kheng (trading as Niklex Supply Co) (Plaintiff): Interim orders set asideInterim orders obtained by the plaintiff were set aside, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of $6,000 to the first and second defendants, as well as individual disbursements. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.