Elly Tham

Elly Tham is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in strata title law and misconduct of arbitrator. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Elly Tham has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	3 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bonds	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Joinder	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Amendment	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Novation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misconduct of arbitrator	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Removal of arbitrator	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Elly Tham has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Elly Tham has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong Partnership	3 cases	100% of cases	Management Corporation v Seasons Park: Strata Title, Negligence & Management Corporation's Right to Sue(Jul 2004) Sun Fook Kong v HDB: Novation, Bonds, and Limitation in Construction Contracts(Apr 2004) Koh Bros v Scotts Development: Arbitrator Misconduct & Removal in Construction Dispute(Sep 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Elly Tham's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Elly Tham's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Management Corporation v Seasons Park: Strata Title, Negligence & Management Corporation's Right to Sue 29 Jul 2004 Seasons Park Ltd (No 2) (Defendant)Partial	29 Jul 2004	Seasons Park Ltd (No 2) (Defendant): Partial JudgmentThe plaintiff’s claim in contract must fail because it had no pleaded cause of action in contract. Plaintiff is only entitled to proceed to trial to determine the very narrow issue of fact in negligence as to whether the defects were caused by the defendant personally and, if so, whether it was an actionable wrong.
2	Sun Fook Kong v HDB: Novation, Bonds, and Limitation in Construction Contracts 06 Apr 2004 Housing and Development Board (Defendant)Won	06 Apr 2004	Housing and Development Board (Defendant): Claims Struck OutDefendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's claims was granted, and the action was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Koh Bros v Scotts Development: Arbitrator Misconduct & Removal in Construction Dispute 20 Sep 2002 Scotts Development (Saraca) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	20 Sep 2002	Scotts Development (Saraca) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Motion to Dismiss Application DeniedMotion to dismiss the application to remove the arbitrator was denied. The contactors’ costs shall be paid by the employers, as taxed or agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.