Emily Choo

Emily Choo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in property law and caveatable interest. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Emily Choo has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in trust law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Trust Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Emily Choo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Emily Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Emily Choo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Emily Choo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Estate Litigation	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Emily Choo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Caveatable Interest	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Emily Choo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Emily Choo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Emily Choo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Emily Choo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Stamford Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	Shaan Taseer v Aamna Taseer: Caveat Removal & Beneficiaries' Rights in Estate Property(Sep 2012) Aamna Taseer v Shaan Taseer: Caveatable Interest in Unadministered Estate(Feb 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Emily Choo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Emily Choo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Shaan Taseer v Aamna Taseer: Caveat Removal & Beneficiaries' Rights in Estate Property 16 Sep 2012 Aamna Taseer (Respondent)Won	16 Sep 2012	Aamna Taseer (Respondent): Caveat Removal UpheldThe Respondent's application to remove the caveat was upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Aamna Taseer v Shaan Taseer: Caveatable Interest in Unadministered Estate 09 Feb 2012 Aamna Taseer (Plaintiff)Won	09 Feb 2012	Aamna Taseer (Plaintiff): Prayers allowedPlaintiff's prayers 1 and 2 allowed; the defendants have failed to show any caveatable interest in 82 Cove Drive.