Emmanuel Chua

Emmanuel Chua is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in recognition of foreign judgments and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and recognition of foreign judgments.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Debt Claims	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Examination of judgment debtor	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Emmanuel Chua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Emmanuel Chua has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong & Leow LLC	2 cases	50% of cases	Goh Thien Phong v UT Singapore Services: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Classification(Oct 2024) JTrust Asia v Group Lease Holdings: Winding Up Application for Inability to Pay Debts(Jul 2024)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Global Distressed Alpha Fund I Ltd Partnership v PT Bakrie Investindo: Interpretation of Order 67 Rule 10(2) of the Rules of Court(Jan 2013)
Drew & Napier LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Global Distressed Alpha Fund v PT Bakrie: Enforcement of UK Judgment in Singapore(Jan 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Emmanuel Chua's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.5
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	28.0 parties avg	8.0	50%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	29.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Emmanuel Chua's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Goh Thien Phong v UT Singapore Services: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Classification 14 Oct 2024 UT Singapore Services Pte Ltd (Non-party, Respondent, Applicant)Lost	14 Oct 2024	UT Singapore Services Pte Ltd (Non-party, Respondent, Applicant): Application DismissedUTSS's application to set aside the Convening Order was dismissed. UTSS opposed the sanction application, which was granted.
2	JTrust Asia v Group Lease Holdings: Winding Up Application for Inability to Pay Debts 25 Jul 2024 JTrust Asia Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	25 Jul 2024	JTrust Asia Pte Ltd (Claimant): Winding up order grantedWinding up order granted. JTA's costs of and incidental to this winding up application be paid to JTA out of GLH’s assets. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Global Distressed Alpha Fund I Ltd Partnership v PT Bakrie Investindo: Interpretation of Order 67 Rule 10(2) of the Rules of Court 29 Jan 2013 Global Distressed Alpha Fund I Ltd Partnership (Respondent, Judgment Creditor)Lost	29 Jan 2013	Global Distressed Alpha Fund I Ltd Partnership (Respondent, Judgment Creditor): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
4	Global Distressed Alpha Fund v PT Bakrie: Enforcement of UK Judgment in Singapore 15 Jan 2013 Global Distressed Alpha Fund I Limited Partnership (Plaintiff, Judgment Creditor, Respondent)Won	15 Jan 2013	Global Distressed Alpha Fund I Limited Partnership (Plaintiff, Judgment Creditor, Respondent): Appeal WonPT Bakrie's appeals against the registration of the UK judgment and the order for examination of judgment debtor were dismissed.