Engelin Teh

Engelin Teh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 19 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and matrimonial assets. Their track record shows a 26.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 11% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Engelin Teh has demonstrated expertise across 68 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	10 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Family Law	7 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Divorce	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Support	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proof of evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Parenting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets Division	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation of Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Consent Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Onus of Proof	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forensic Accounting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Architects Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Lease	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Planning Control	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Search Warrants	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied Undertaking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Engelin Teh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Engelin Teh has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Engelin Teh Practice LLC	11 cases	58% of cases	AXM v AXO: Overlapping Interim & Final Maintenance Orders Under Women's Charter(Feb 2014) AYM v AYL: Variation of Consent Order for Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance after Divorce(Nov 2012) Ong Jane Rebecca v PricewaterhouseCoopers: Professional Negligence Claim(Sep 2011)
Engelin Teh & Partners	5 cases	26% of cases	Shoba D/O Gunasekaran v A Rajandran: Child Custody Dispute(Jun 2001) De Souza Tay & Goh v Singapore Press Holdings: Defamation Claim over Article on L&H(Jun 2001) Business Software Alliance v SM Summit: Discovery, Implied Undertaking & Defamation(Apr 2000)
A C Fergusson Law Corporation	1 cases	5% of cases	Chan Yuen Lan v See Fong Mun: Resulting Trust, Property Disputes(Jun 2014)
Engeline Teh Practice LLC	1 cases	5% of cases	Doctor's Associates Inc v Lim Eng Wah: Trademark Infringement & Passing Off Dispute(Apr 2012)
David Lim & Partners	1 cases	5% of cases	Golden Village v Marina Centre: Enforceability of Unregistered Lease Agreement(Jan 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Engelin Teh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 2 (11%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	19.0 parties avg	9.0	5%
Lost	52.0 parties avg	2.0	26%
Partial	72.4 parties avg	2.4	37%
Stayed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	5%
Won	54.3 parties avg	4.3	26%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	37.6 parties avg	7.6
2001	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2002	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Engelin Teh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(5%)	5%
Lost	5(26%)	26%
Partial	7(37%)	37%
Stayed	1(5%)	5%
Won	5(26%)	26%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
AUD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
SGD	15,900.00	1,445.4511 cases	11

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 12	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Stayed: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 19 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chan Yuen Lan v See Fong Mun: Resulting Trust, Property Disputes 23 Jun 2014 Chan Yuen Lan (Appellant)Partial	23 Jun 2014	Chan Yuen Lan (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partMdm Chan holds only 15.83% of the beneficial interest in the Property, as opposed to the whole of the beneficial interest, on a resulting trust for Mr See. Mdm Chan is entitled to 15% of her costs in this appeal. The parties are to bear their own costs of the hearing below. The usual consequential orders shall apply. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	AXM v AXO: Overlapping Interim & Final Maintenance Orders Under Women's Charter 16 Feb 2014 AXM (Appellant)Partial	16 Feb 2014	AXM (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; the court substituted the District Judge’s Final Maintenance Order with an order that the Husband pay a monthly maintenance amount of A$4,500 for a period of 30 months from April 2012 to October 2014, and thereafter a monthly maintenance amount of A$5,500.
3	AYM v AYL: Variation of Consent Order for Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance after Divorce 22 Nov 2012 AYM (Appellant)Partial	22 Nov 2012	AYM (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal against the refusal to vary the terms of division of matrimonial assets was dismissed. Appeal against the order of a lump sum maintenance of $750,000 to be paid to the Wife out of the Husband’s share of the sale proceeds was allowed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Doctor's Associates Inc v Lim Eng Wah: Trademark Infringement & Passing Off Dispute 17 Apr 2012 Lim Eng Wah (trading as SUBWAY NICHE) (Defendant)Won	17 Apr 2012	Lim Eng Wah (trading as SUBWAY NICHE) (Defendant): Claims DismissedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claims against the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Ong Jane Rebecca v PricewaterhouseCoopers: Professional Negligence Claim 13 Sep 2011 Ong Jane Rebecca (Plaintiff)Partial	13 Sep 2011	Ong Jane Rebecca (Plaintiff): Partial compliance orderedFirst week of trial dates vacated; new directions issued with 'unless' orders.
6	Doctor's Associates Inc v Lim Eng Wah: Trade Mark Infringement & Passing Off Dispute 28 Apr 2011 Lim Eng Wah (trading as SUBWAY NICHE) (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	28 Apr 2011	Lim Eng Wah (trading as SUBWAY NICHE) (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe defendant's appeal was dismissed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
7	YG v YH: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Child Custody & Maintenance Dispute 29 Sep 2008 YG (Appellant)Partial	29 Sep 2008	YG (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe Husband's appeal was partially allowed. The Wife is to pay the Husband SGD 15,900. The Husband is to retain ownership of the current car, the Smith Barney Account (value of SGD 61,100) as well as the cheque of SGD 10,400 when paid by Smith Barney; and the parties are to retain the rest of their assets currently held in their respective names. The DJ’s previous orders on the division of matrimonial assets are set aside and the orders on division are to be effected instead. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	XP v Public Prosecutor: Outrage of Modesty, Standard of Proof, and Witness Credibility 03 Jul 2008 XP (Appellant)Won	03 Jul 2008	XP (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the conviction was allowed, and the appellant was acquitted of all charges.
9	Yap Hwee May Kathryn v Geh Thien Ee Martin: Division of Matrimonial Assets Dispute 02 Jul 2007 Yap Hwee May Kathryn (Plaintiff)Partial	02 Jul 2007	Yap Hwee May Kathryn (Plaintiff): Declaration granted for propertyDeclaration granted that the Plaintiff is the sole legal and beneficial owner of the property.
10	Lee Bee Kim Jennifer v Lim Yew Khang Cecil: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Wife's Maintenance 08 Nov 2005 Lim Yew Khang Cecil (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	08 Nov 2005	Lim Yew Khang Cecil (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed in toto. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Yee Hong Pte Ltd v Tan Chye Hee Andrew: Stay of Proceedings and Arbitration in Construction Dispute 30 Aug 2005 Tan Chye Hee Andrew (Defendant)Stayed	30 Aug 2005	Tan Chye Hee Andrew (Defendant): Proceedings StayedProceedings stayed and referred to arbitration.
12	Keimfarben GmbH v Soo Nam Yuen: Assessment of Damages for Wrongful Seizure 06 Jul 2004 Keimfarben GmbH and Co KG (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	06 Jul 2004	Keimfarben GmbH and Co KG (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the original award was set aside and replaced with an award of $5,000 as damages. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	MRI Worldwide Ltd v Management Recruiters International: Winding Up Petition Based on Disputed Debt 12 Aug 2002 MRI Worldwide Ltd (Petitioner)Lost	12 Aug 2002	MRI Worldwide Ltd (Petitioner): Petition DismissedWinding up petition dismissed with costs to be taxed on the standard basis, if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Golden Village v Marina Centre: Enforceability of Unregistered Lease Agreement 24 Jan 2002 Golden Village Multiplex Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	24 Jan 2002	Golden Village Multiplex Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedGolden Village's appeal was dismissed, and the agreement for lease was held to be enforceable in equity.
15	Shoba D/O Gunasekaran v A Rajandran: Child Custody Dispute 18 Jun 2001 Shoba D/O Gunasekaran (Appellant, Petitioner)Partial	18 Jun 2001	Shoba D/O Gunasekaran (Appellant, Petitioner): Appeal partially allowedAccess to child varied.
16	De Souza Tay & Goh v Singapore Press Holdings: Defamation Claim over Article on L&H 15 Jun 2001 De Souza Tay & Goh (suing as a firm) (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Jun 2001	De Souza Tay & Goh (suing as a firm) (Plaintiff): Appeals dismissedThe plaintiffs' appeals were dismissed, and their defamation claim was unsuccessful.
17	Business Software Alliance v SM Summit: Discovery, Implied Undertaking & Defamation 23 Apr 2000 Summit CD Manufacture Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Dismissed	23 Apr 2000	Summit CD Manufacture Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Applications for striking out dismissedApplications for striking out the defendants' applications for discovery were dismissed. (Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore).
18	Tan Tiang Hin Jerry v Singapore Medical Council: Disciplinary Proceedings & Natural Justice 22 Mar 2000 Tan Tiang Hin Jerry (Appellant)Won	22 Mar 2000	Tan Tiang Hin Jerry (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; the appellant was awarded two thirds of the costs here and below (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Microsoft v SM Summit: Jurisdiction, Criminal Procedure Code & Implied Undertaking 08 Mar 2000 Summit CD Manufacture Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	08 Mar 2000	Summit CD Manufacture Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.