Ephraim Tan

Ephraim Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and contract of service. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ephraim Tan has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Taxation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract of service	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ephraim Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ephraim Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Taytonn Pte Ltd v Tay Joe Boy: Interpretation of Contractual Terms and Fiduciary Duties(Oct 2021)
Wong Partnership LLP	1 cases	50% of cases	Uday Mehra v L Capital: Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy(Jan 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ephraim Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 12.1
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	115.0 parties avg	15.0	50%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	115.0 parties avg	15.0
2022	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ephraim Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,000.00	1,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Uday Mehra v L Capital: Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy 27 Jan 2022 Nauman Hasan (Defendant)Won	27 Jan 2022	Nauman Hasan (Defendant): Claims DismissedAll claims against this defendant were dismissed.
2	Taytonn Pte Ltd v Tay Joe Boy: Interpretation of Contractual Terms and Fiduciary Duties 24 Oct 2021 Tay Joe Boy appointed by order dated 24 July 2019 to represent the estate of Seow Yeow Hin deceased (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	24 Oct 2021	Tay Joe Boy appointed by order dated 24 July 2019 to represent the estate of Seow Yeow Hin deceased (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part regarding the undervalue issue. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.