Eric Chin

Eric Chin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in land law and eminent domain. Their track record shows a 89.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Eric Chin has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in land law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Land Law	5 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Property Law	5 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Eminent Domain	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Compulsory Acquisition	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director Disqualification	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pointe Gourde principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eric Chin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Eric Chin has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	8 cases	89% of cases	Ung Yoke Hooi v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Property Seizure under Criminal Procedure Code(Apr 2009) Eng Foong Ho v Attorney-General: Locus Standi, Equal Protection & Land Acquisition(Jan 2009) Ung Yoke Hooi v Attorney-General: Application for Release of Bank Accounts under Criminal Procedure Code(Aug 2008)
State Counsel	1 cases	11% of cases	Ng Boo Tan v Collector of Land Revenue: Compulsory Land Acquisition & Compensation(Jul 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Eric Chin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 3 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	11%
Won	82.5 parties avg	2.5	89%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Eric Chin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(11%)	11%
Won	8(89%)	89%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.007 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ung Yoke Hooi v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of Property Seizure under Criminal Procedure Code 12 Apr 2009 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	12 Apr 2009	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favour of the Attorney-General.
2	Eng Foong Ho v Attorney-General: Locus Standi, Equal Protection & Land Acquisition 04 Jan 2009 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	04 Jan 2009	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ung Yoke Hooi v Attorney-General: Application for Release of Bank Accounts under Criminal Procedure Code 20 Aug 2008 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	20 Aug 2008	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication for leave to apply for a mandatory order was refused. Originating summons dismissed with costs.
4	Eng Foong Ho v Attorney-General: Constitutional Challenge to Temple Land Acquisition 08 May 2008 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	08 May 2008	Attorney-General (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantApplication dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Teng Fuh Holdings v Collector of Land Revenue: Certiorari, Mandamus & Land Acquisition 08 Mar 2007 Collector of Land Revenue (Respondent)Won	08 Mar 2007	Collector of Land Revenue (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal by Teng Fuh Holdings Pte Ltd was dismissed with costs.
6	Ng Boo Tan v Collector of Land Revenue: Compulsory Land Acquisition & Compensation 30 Jul 2002 Collector of Land Revenue (Respondent)Won	30 Jul 2002	Collector of Land Revenue (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the Respondent; no monetary amount specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Lee Huay Kok v Attorney General: Director Disqualification after Corruption Conviction 30 Sep 2001 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	30 Sep 2001	Attorney-General (Respondent): WonThe Attorney General successfully argued against the application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Collector of Land Revenue v Heng Long Investment: Interpretation of 'Amount Awarded' under Land Acquisition Act 21 Jun 2001 Collector of Land Revenue (Appellant)Won	21 Jun 2001	Collector of Land Revenue (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Collector of Land Revenue's appeal was allowed, establishing that the 'amount awarded' refers to a composite award.
9	Re Flint: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Mitco - Legal Profession Act 12 Mar 2001 Attorney-General (Respondent)Neutral	12 Mar 2001	Attorney-General (Respondent): NeutralThe Attorney General was a respondent in the application. The outcome of the application was neutral to their role.