Eric Low

Eric Low is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and winding up. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Eric Low has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and insolvency law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eric Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eric Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eric Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eric Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eric Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eric Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eric Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eric Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eric Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eric Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Real Estate Agency	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eric Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Eric Low has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
UniLegal LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	L & M Geotechnic v CEP Instruments: Setting Aside Default Judgment & Proof of Debt in Winding Up(Sep 2004)
Khattar Wong & Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	Hemlata Pathela v Suresh Partabrai: Unlicensed Agent's Commission Claim & Contract Enforceability(Jul 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Eric Low's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	110.0 parties avg	10.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	110.0 parties avg	10.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Eric Low's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	L & M Geotechnic v CEP Instruments: Setting Aside Default Judgment & Proof of Debt in Winding Up 13 Sep 2004 L & M Geotechnic Pte Ltd (Petitioner)Won	13 Sep 2004	L & M Geotechnic Pte Ltd (Petitioner): Judgment dated 22 July 2002 to stand; Liquidators to accept the Proof of Debt filed by L & M on 11 November 2002The court ordered that the judgment dated 22 July 2002 was to stand and the liquidators were to accept the proof of debt filed by L & M on 11 November 2002.
2	Hemlata Pathela v Suresh Partabrai: Unlicensed Agent's Commission Claim & Contract Enforceability 04 Jul 2000 Hemlata Pathela (trading as Coco Properties) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	04 Jul 2000	Hemlata Pathela (trading as Coco Properties) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe plaintiff's appeal was dismissed, and she was not entitled to recover the commission through the process of court.