Eric Tin

Eric Tin is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and measure of damages.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Eric Tin has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in negligence and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Negligence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eric Tin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eric Tin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eric Tin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eric Tin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eric Tin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eric Tin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eric Tin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eric Tin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claim	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eric Tin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Medical Misdiagnosis	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eric Tin has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Statistical Evidence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eric Tin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Loss of Inheritance Claim	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eric Tin has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Eric Tin has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Donaldson & Burkinshaw LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Armstrong v Quest Laboratories: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Causation in Misdiagnosis of Melanoma(Nov 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Eric Tin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Eric Tin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Armstrong v Quest Laboratories: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Causation in Misdiagnosis of Melanoma 25 Nov 2019 Tan Hong Wui (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	25 Nov 2019	Tan Hong Wui (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Dismissed in PartAppeal dismissed in part regarding the Breach Question and the Causation Question, but allowed in part regarding the Damages Question.